From: <rka...@ri...> - 2004-10-29 20:22:41
|
Hi Miguel, I know. I had hoped to start on that this week, but ran into some=20 semi-expected problems getting a computational package going on our=20 Physics beowulf cluster, so I got distracted. I did look at the code a bit and saw some comments about=20 getAtomSetCount not been implemented. It looks to me like you did, but=20= I have a question about why you did it differently than how the other=20 atomsetCollection fields (like fileHader, collectionName etc.) are=20 accessed from the SmarterJmolAdapter. You return the value by calling a=20= get method, as opposed to directly accessing the field. Show we do it=20 one way or another or do you feel that mixing the approaches up is=20 fine? Ren=E9 On Oct 29, 2004, at 3:45 PM, Miguel wrote: > Good. > > Rene, I know that we need to pick up the development on the > names/properties stuff. > > > Miguel > |