From: Miguel <mi...@jm...> - 2004-07-15 14:15:24
|
> I make a mistake with the first 10 positions:-( > and the naming of N looks strange " N A" though the N is on the right > position. > and HEM546.O1A is identified as oxygen by Jmol, which is correct This is the key to the answer. This formula spans two lines. This is the first time that I have ever seen a formula that took more than one line. The code is only taking the second FORMUL record for HEM ... > 123456789.12Xx__6789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456789.123456Xx > FORMUL 4 HEM C34 H32 N4 O4 FE1 ++ . > 1MBO 63 > FORMUL 4 HEM O2 This one is overriding the previous FORMUL definition for HEM Q: Why are there 2 definitions for HEM? Is it because the HEM can carry two oxygens in its oxidized state? Q: What is the meating of the ++ and the . in the first formula definition for HEM? Miguel |