We are in 2014 and not creating a java project without using mvn/gradle is embarrassing. :)
If you want, I'll be glad to help you with that. Another thing that make some sense is to upload JMetal to MVN repository.
We have started to use Maven in the current development version, but as Maven is new for us it will take time to provide a full featured release based on it.
I would be happy if you could help us in this issue.
Antonio
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Yes, sure.
Just give me access to the repository on bitbucket service. My user name is josecampos.
btw: another good idea is to add a stylecheck to the compilation code. because there are several source files with different identation. and we can also add another things, like fingbugs, etc.
--
Cheers
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Yes, sure.
Just give me access to the repository on bitbucket service. My user name
is josecampos.
btw: another good idea is to add a stylecheck to the compilation code.
because there are several source files with different identation. and we
can also add another things, like fingbugs, etc.
Status: open Group: v1.0_(example) Created: Fri May 02, 2014 10:10 AM UTC by José Campos Last Updated: Fri May 02, 2014 10:24 AM UTC Owner: nobody
Hi,
We are in 2014 and not creating a java project without using mvn/gradle is
embarrassing. :)
If you want, I'll be glad to help you with that. Another thing that make
some sense is to upload JMetal to MVN repository.
There are two reasons to do that:
- We usually start to work with new features (algorithms, problems, quality
indicators, etc) and some of them are finally thrown away, so the current
development version is not very useful to other people.
- Those new features is the result of our current research work, and while
jMetal is available for free, it would not be a good idea to allow anyone
to see what we are doing until we have published it.
Status: open Group: v1.0_(example) Created: Fri May 02, 2014 10:10 AM UTC by José Campos Last Updated: Fri May 02, 2014 10:35 AM UTC Owner: nobody
Hi,
We are in 2014 and not creating a java project without using mvn/gradle is
embarrassing. :)
If you want, I'll be glad to help you with that. Another thing that make
some sense is to upload JMetal to MVN repository.
ok, but those aren't reasons to don't have the main repository available. :)
(you are using BitBucket, I'm in favor to move it to GitHub)
on GitHub you can create a team/organization called JMetal with a public project called JMetal (and this will be the official main repository).
Which person (you, I, others) can clone the main repo and do what they want. So, imagine that you want to create a super-secret algorithm. You clone the main repo, and make it private. After publishing that algorithm, you do a pull request (please visit https://help.github.com/articles/using-pull-requests for more information) and someone responsible for the main repo will or will not accept your changes and merge them into the main repo.
With this, the main repository will only contains stable code and is accessible to everyone. And everyone can have your own private/public copy of the main repo.
--
Cheers
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Ok, we can try with GitHub. Just consider the jMetal5.0 as the real one,
because what I usually do is to make a clone of the former version and add
to it the features I consider of interest.
ok, but those aren't reasons to don't have the main repository available.
:)
(you are using BitBucket, I'm in favor to move it to GitHub)
on GitHub you can create a team/organization called JMetal with a public
project called JMetal (and this will be the official main repository).
Which person (you, I, others) can clone the main repo and do what they
want. So, imagine that you want to create a super-secret algorithm. You
clone the main repo, and make it private. After publishing that algorithm,
you do a pull request (please visit https://help.github.com/articles/using-pull-requests for more
information) and someone responsible for the main repo will or will not
accept your changes and merge them into the main repo.
With this, the main repository will only contains stable code and is
accessible to everyone. And everyone can have your own private/public copy
of the main repo.
Status: open Group: v1.0_(example) Created: Fri May 02, 2014 10:10 AM UTC by José Campos Last Updated: Fri May 02, 2014 10:35 AM UTC Owner: nobody
Hi,
We are in 2014 and not creating a java project without using mvn/gradle is
embarrassing. :)
If you want, I'll be glad to help you with that. Another thing that make
some sense is to upload JMetal to MVN repository.
why didn't you create a organization called JMetal?
I'm just insisting on that because 1) I hate SourceForge, 2) for example under that organization you can create a website repository and publishing it with the github.io domain instead of sourceforge.net, and also the JMetal library repository, and so on.
my user on github is just 'jose' http://jose.github.io/, now the repository is public so, after these details I will clone the main repo and start playing with it.
another details:
1) please use jmetal instead of jmetal50 on the name of the repository (I understand that next release probability will be 5.0, but only the name is better)
2) why the repository only have one commit?
--
Cheers
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
why didn't you create a organization called JMetal?
I'm just insisting on that because 1) I hate SourceForge, 2) for
example under that organization you can create a website repository and
publishing it with the github.io domain instead of sourceforge.net, and
also the JMetal library repository, and so on.
my user on github is just 'jose' http://jose.github.io/, now the
repository is public so, after these details I will clone the main repo and
start playing with it.
another details:
1) please use jmetal instead of jmetal50 on the name of the repository (I
understand that next release probability will be 5.0, but only the name is
better)
2) why the repository only have one commit?
Status: open Group: v1.0_(example) Created: Fri May 02, 2014 10:10 AM UTC by José Campos Last Updated: Fri May 02, 2014 10:35 AM UTC Owner: nobody
Hi,
We are in 2014 and not creating a java project without using mvn/gradle is
embarrassing. :)
If you want, I'll be glad to help you with that. Another thing that make
some sense is to upload JMetal to MVN repository.
Status: open Group: v1.0_(example) Created: Fri May 02, 2014 10:10 AM UTC by José Campos Last Updated: Fri May 02, 2014 10:35 AM UTC Owner: nobody
Hi,
We are in 2014 and not creating a java project without using mvn/gradle is
embarrassing. :)
If you want, I'll be glad to help you with that. Another thing that make
some sense is to upload JMetal to MVN repository.
We have started to use Maven in the current development version, but as Maven is new for us it will take time to provide a full featured release based on it.
I would be happy if you could help us in this issue.
Antonio
Yes, sure.
Just give me access to the repository on bitbucket service. My user name is josecampos.
btw: another good idea is to add a stylecheck to the compilation code. because there are several source files with different identation. and we can also add another things, like fingbugs, etc.
--
Cheers
Ok, I have just created a jMetal5.0 project with the contents of the 4.5
version: https://bitbucket.org/ajnebro/jmetal5.0
We can start plying with it.
Cheers,
Antonio
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 12:35 PM, "José Campos" zecapistolas@users.sf.netwrote:
Related
Bugs: #7
Hi,
Thanks. But why the official repository isn't available (at least read permission) to everyone?
--
Cheers
There are two reasons to do that:
- We usually start to work with new features (algorithms, problems, quality
indicators, etc) and some of them are finally thrown away, so the current
development version is not very useful to other people.
- Those new features is the result of our current research work, and while
jMetal is available for free, it would not be a good idea to allow anyone
to see what we are doing until we have published it.
Antonio
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:20 PM, "José Campos" zecapistolas@users.sf.netwrote:
Related
Bugs: #7
Hi,
ok, but those aren't reasons to don't have the main repository available. :)
(you are using BitBucket, I'm in favor to move it to GitHub)
on GitHub you can create a team/organization called JMetal with a public project called JMetal (and this will be the official main repository).
Which person (you, I, others) can clone the main repo and do what they want. So, imagine that you want to create a super-secret algorithm. You clone the main repo, and make it private. After publishing that algorithm, you do a pull request (please visit https://help.github.com/articles/using-pull-requests for more information) and someone responsible for the main repo will or will not accept your changes and merge them into the main repo.
With this, the main repository will only contains stable code and is accessible to everyone. And everyone can have your own private/public copy of the main repo.
--
Cheers
Ok, we can try with GitHub. Just consider the jMetal5.0 as the real one,
because what I usually do is to make a clone of the former version and add
to it the features I consider of interest.
The project is hosted here: https://github.com/ajnebro/jmetal50
Is you github id the same as in bitbucket?
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 6:51 PM, "José Campos" zecapistolas@users.sf.netwrote:
Related
Bugs: #7
ok, thanks.
why didn't you create a organization called JMetal?
I'm just insisting on that because 1) I hate SourceForge, 2) for example under that organization you can create a website repository and publishing it with the github.io domain instead of sourceforge.net, and also the JMetal library repository, and so on.
my user on github is just 'jose' http://jose.github.io/, now the repository is public so, after these details I will clone the main repo and start playing with it.
another details:
1) please use jmetal instead of jmetal50 on the name of the repository (I understand that next release probability will be 5.0, but only the name is better)
2) why the repository only have one commit?
--
Cheers
I have just renamed the repository.
I will take a look to the issue of the organization during the weekend.
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 7:14 PM, "José Campos" zecapistolas@users.sf.netwrote:
Related
Bugs: #7
ok. why github repository only has one commit?
--
Cheers
José,
I would prefer you to use my email address in
http://jmetal.sourceforge.net/ to talk about anything.
Antonio
On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 10:16 PM, "José Campos" zecapistolas@users.sf.netwrote:
Related
Bugs: #7