Re: [Jmdns-discuss] separation of TimerTasks into top level classes

[Joshua C. <jp...@ki...>]

On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 15:53 -0800, Rick Blair wrote:
> Hi Scott,
> 
> Sounds like a good idea.
> 
> As to the javax package.  The package was picked by Arthur Van Hoff  
> when we first created the project.    He was a senior staff engineer  
> in Suns Java product group.  I think we need to keep it in javax.

Hum. Sounds like the intention was to wrap JmDNS into a Sun add-on
library, but that never happened. If there was a Sun / Java JSR official
interface, I could see that interface being implemented in javax, but it
seems strange for a non-Sun sponsored implementation to use javax.

I can't find anything online about rules or guide lines for the use of
javax, and it doesn't really matter to me, it was just a suggestion, so
I'll wont be upset either way.

-Josh