Re: [jibx-users] found bug with setter/getter and primitives

[<gw...@cr...>]

hold on a second ;-) tried to reproduce this error in a unit test, but =20=

i can't get the same behaviour now...will check that and come back to =20=

the mailing list with either a solution or a more detailed test setup =20=

for reproducing this error.

br,
g=FCnther

Am 13.11.2007 um 14:10 schrieb G=FCnther Wieser:

> hi,
>
> using jibx 1.1.5, we found a problem with using getters and setters
> and primitive types.
>
> here's an example class:
>
> public class Address {
>
>    private int test;
>
>    private int getJiBXTest() {
>    	return this.test;
>    }
>
>    private void setJiBXTest(int test) {
>    	this.test=3Dtest;
>    }
> }
>
> here's the binding (snippet):
>
> 	<mapping name=3D"address" class=3D"data.Address" abstract=3D"true"=

> flexible=3D"true"
> 		ordered=3D"false">
> 		<value name=3D"test" set-method=3D"setJiBXTest"
> 			get-method=3D"getJiBXTest" usage=3D"required" =
nillable=3D"true" />
> 	</mapping>
>
> when compiling this, i get the following output:
>
>  [bind] object binding for data.Address create class data.Address
>     [bind] structure unordered, flexible
>     [bind] element id from property from getJiXBId to setJiXBId
> (java.lang.Long)
>     [bind] element street from property from getJiXBStreet to
> setJiXBStreet (java.lang.String)
>     [bind] element city from property from getJiXBCity to setJiXBCity
> (java.lang.String)
>     [bind] element yn from property from getJiBXYn to setJiBXYn
> (boolean)
>     [bind] element test from property from getJiBXTest to setJiBXTest
> (int)
>     [bind] Generating code for mapping data.Customer
>     [bind] Error running binding compiler
>     [bind] *** Error during code generation for file 'C:/JavaDev322/
> JiXB Test/src/customer_binding.xml' - please enter a bug report for
> this error in Jira if the problem is not listed as fixed on the online
> status page ***
>     [bind] java.lang.IllegalStateException: Internal error: Expected
> object reference on stack , found boolean
>     [bind] full stack:
>     [bind] 0: org.jibx.runtime.impl.MarshallingContext
>     [bind] 1: boolean
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding.classes.MethodBuilder.verifyStackObject(MethodBuilder.java:=20=

> 551)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx=20
> .binding.classes.MethodBuilder.appendIFNONNULL(MethodBuilder.java:
> 620)
>     [bind] at
> org.jibx.binding.def.ValueChild.genMarshal(ValueChild.java:622)
>     [bind] at
> org.jibx.binding.def.ValueChild.genContentMarshal(ValueChild.java:818)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding.def.NestedStructure.genContentMarshal(NestedStructure.java:=20=

> 355)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding.def.ObjectBinding.genMarshalContentCall(ObjectBinding.java:=20=

> 878)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx.binding.def.ObjectBinding.genContentMarshal(ObjectBinding.java:
> 948)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx=20
> .binding.def.ElementWrapper.genContentMarshal(ElementWrapper.java:
> 464)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding
> .def.ComponentProperty.genContentMarshal(ComponentProperty.java:318)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding
> .def.PassThroughComponent.genContentMarshal(PassThroughComponent.java:
> 116)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding.def.NestedCollection.genContentMarshal(NestedCollection.java:
> 269)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding.def.ObjectBinding.genMarshalContentCall(ObjectBinding.java:=20=

> 878)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx.binding.def.ObjectBinding.genContentMarshal(ObjectBinding.java:
> 948)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding
> .def.ComponentProperty.genContentMarshal(ComponentProperty.java:318)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding.def.NestedStructure.genContentMarshal(NestedStructure.java:=20=

> 355)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding.def.NestedStructure.genContentMarshal(NestedStructure.java:=20=

> 355)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding.def.ObjectBinding.genMarshalContentCall(ObjectBinding.java:=20=

> 878)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx.binding.def.ObjectBinding.genContentMarshal(ObjectBinding.java:
> 948)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx=20
> .binding.def.ElementWrapper.genContentMarshal(ElementWrapper.java:
> 464)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding
> .def
> .MappingDefinition
> .generateMarshalImplementation(MappingDefinition.java:797)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding.def.MappingDefinition.generateCode(MappingDefinition.java:=20
> 856)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding.def.DefinitionContext.generateCode(DefinitionContext.java:=20
> 669)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .jibx
> .binding.def.BindingDefinition.generateCode(BindingDefinition.java:=20
> 661)
>     [bind] at org.jibx.binding.Compile.compile(Compile.java:305)
>     [bind] at
> org.jibx.binding.ant.CompileTask.execute(CompileTask.java:248)
>     [bind] at
> org.apache.tools.ant.UnknownElement.execute(UnknownElement.java:275)
>     [bind] at org.apache.tools.ant.Task.perform(Task.java:364)
>     [bind] at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.execute(Target.java:341)
>     [bind] at org.apache.tools.ant.Target.performTasks(Target.java:=20
> 369)
>     [bind] at
> org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeSortedTargets(Project.java:1216)
>     [bind] at org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTarget(Project.java:
> 1185)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .apache
> .tools.ant.helper.DefaultExecutor.executeTargets(DefaultExecutor.java:
> 40)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .eclipse
> .ant
> .internal
> .ui
> .antsupport
> .EclipseDefaultExecutor.executeTargets(EclipseDefaultExecutor.java:32)
>     [bind] at
> org.apache.tools.ant.Project.executeTargets(Project.java:1068)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .eclipse
> .ant
> .internal.ui.antsupport.InternalAntRunner.run(InternalAntRunner.java:
> 423)
>     [bind] at
> org
> .eclipse
> .ant
> .internal.ui.antsupport.InternalAntRunner.main(InternalAntRunner.java:
> 137)
>
>
> when i change the type of the getter/setter parameter/return value to
> Integer instead of int, everything works fine. so from the error
> message and from the workaround, i think jibx expects no primitives.
> if this is the case and this is something that cannot be changed, it
> should be stated in the documentation.
>
> you may ask why we need setter and getter for an int value? well, of
> course we don't store the value in an int like in this example, we
> store it in a (very weird) data class that takes a primitive in its
> set method. so changing to field access won't help, because even a
> self-written serializer/deserializer won't help (accessing these data
> classes is very weird!).
>
> br,
> g=FCnther
> --=20
> G=FCnther Wieser
> creative-it
> Guglgasse 6/1/11/1
> A-1110 Wien
> gw...@cr...
> http://www.creative-it.com
>
>
>
>
> =
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
> Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a =20
> browser.
> Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> _______________________________________________
> jibx-users mailing list
> jib...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
>



--=20
G=FCnther Wieser
creative-it
Guglgasse 6/1/11/1
A-1110 Wien
gw...@cr...
http://www.creative-it.com