I plead for an repriorisation. The technical abilities of jGuard are enormous. It is only that, that the framework is very badly documented. A general schema of the architecture of JGuard can help to understand framework. As you might know, the acceptance of frameworks remains low when documentation is not given or not very easy to understand.
I would say, before introducing new technical features, invest in a better documentation for better clarity which results in better and greater acceptance in the Java community.
Regards, chk
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Logged In: YES
user_id=1859282
Originator: NO
I plead for an repriorisation. The technical abilities of jGuard are enormous. It is only that, that the framework is very badly documented. A general schema of the architecture of JGuard can help to understand framework. As you might know, the acceptance of frameworks remains low when documentation is not given or not very easy to understand.
I would say, before introducing new technical features, invest in a better documentation for better clarity which results in better and greater acceptance in the Java community.
Regards, chk
Logged In: YES
user_id=824172
Originator: YES
Hi,
i'm agree with you.
i've set to the highest priority your request and will do this schema quickly.
cheers,
Charles.
Logged In: YES
user_id=1715004
Originator: NO
Merci pour vos efforts et bon courage pour la suite
en tt cas si vous avez besoin d'ade je suis tjrs a votre disposition
cordialment
H_A_M_A_D_A