Re: [Jfs-discussion] jfs 'tunning' ?
Brought to you by:
blaschke-oss,
shaggyk
From: Christian K. <li...@ne...> - 2007-10-31 02:15:27
|
On Tue, 30 Oct 2007, Peer-Joachim Koch wrote: > EMC CX700 > riva:~ # time dd if=/dev/emcpowerb1 of=/dev/null bs=64k count=5000 > 5000+0 records in > 5000+0 records out > > real 0m3.795s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m0.420s So, about 312MB in 3.7s or 84MB/s (if I didn't miscalculate this late at night :) > OLD EMC FC4700 > riva:~ # time dd if=/dev/emcpowera1 of=/dev/null bs=64k count=5000 > 5000+0 records in > 5000+0 records out > > real 0m9.531s > user 0m0.010s > sys 0m0.890s still 32MB/s > top - 21:12:21 up 15 days, 14:03, 1 user, load avg: 1.23, 0.67, 0.57 > Tasks: 705 total, 1 running, 704 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie > Cpu(s): 0.6% user, 4.6% system, 1.6% nice, 93.2% idle hm, I'm often looking for a value named "wa" for "iowait" (also visible in vmstat(8)) - that way one could tell if the system is actually waiting for I/O to finish. you CPU is pretty much idle, I'd suspect the system to be more busy than that when waiting for/doing I/O. > time num of files amount transfer avg. rate total time > 17:47:01 2674994 768.18 MB 45048.29 KB/sec 03:00:12 So, you're getting 84MB/s from your EMC, 32MB from your "old" EMC (you don't use?), and your backup finishes with 44MB/s (instead of 84MB/s). But your box is not loaded or sluggish/unresponsive...strange >>> Do not write to the journal. The primary use of this option is to allow >>> for higher performance when restoring a volume from backup media. The >>> integrity of the volume is not guaranteed if the system abnormally >>> abends." >> >> You do not want to use this option on a mail server! Oh, yeah...listen to what Dave says :) I was only mentioning this option, not suggesting to actually use it for your particular setup. >>>> While the backup is working Ican only see ~1MB/sec on the >>>> SAN switch. I'm a bit confused, because you mentioned 1MB/s in your last mail....? C. -- BOFH excuse #383: Your processor has taken a ride to Heaven's Gate on the UFO behind Hale-Bopp's comet. |