Re: [Jfs-discussion] JFS in SuSE Enterprise 9
Brought to you by:
blaschke-oss,
shaggyk
From: Sonny R. <so...@bu...> - 2005-03-17 20:23:41
|
On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 07:50:26PM -0500, Chris Penney wrote: > I'm considering using JFS for an NFS server and I'm curious if anyone > has any feedback on any of the following questions. The hardware is a > dual cpu pentium 4 with 2gb ram, gigabit ethernet, and dual qlogic > 23xx hbas running SuSE Enterprise 9 w/ SP1. I'm using lvm2 to turn > four 1TB luns into a 4TB volume. Ok, since Shaggy hasn't piped in I'll try and answer your questions. > Questions: > > 1) With service pack 1 applied to SLES 9 is there anything I'd be > missing in terms if important JFS patches? SLES 9 SP1 should most if not all of the recent bugfixes. > 2) Are the default mkfs.jfs options ok? There doesn't seem to be any > options to specific stripe widths, etc. I assume it autodetects or > doesn't need that? Yeah JFS doesn't preallocate groups or aggregates at mkfs time so there's really not much to specify unless you need to set up an external journal or set a volume label. > 3) Is there any reason not to use jfs for an NFS server? There shouldn't be, we've used it fairly extensively on NFS servers. > 4) Are there issues with SMP systems + JFS + NFS? Again, there shouldn't be, we've run JFS on many different servers/archs without problems. > 5) Are there any tuning options I should consider? If you're typical workload is very meta-data intensive with lots of threads etc. you might want to increase the nTxLock or nTxBlock module parameters, but in general it shouldn't be necessary. Sonny |