Re: [Jfs-discussion] character set design problem

[<cas...@ya...>]

 --- Dave Kleikamp <sh...@au...> a écrit : > On Tue,
2004-01-20 at 09:06, Bjoern JACKE wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 

> > Even if all people use the same encoding, 
> > let's say UTF-8, problems come up when there are RPMs or any
> kind of 
> > archives which bring files whose names are not validly UTF-8
> encoded, 
> > maybe in latin1 or EUC_JP.
> > These files can simply not be created on JFS, which leads to
> 
> > unforeseeable problems. Even if one would use an encoding
> like 
> > iocharset=iso8859-1, which is 8-bit, utf-8 cannot be created
> because 
> > not all 255 possible characters are valid in iso8859-1. 
> 
> Actually, I believe that the iso8859-1 charset was fixed in
> the 2.6
> kernel so that all 8-bit characters are represented.
> 

Sorry for asking
What character set should we use default when we mount a 
jfs filesystem with a 2.6 kernel ?
I use utf8 but sometimes i have the problem described above.

 
> I believe the new-and-improved iso8859-1 charset provides a
> good
> solution.  Is the fix in the 2.6 kernel sufficient, or does
> someone need
> to push the iso8859-1 fix back to the 2.4 kernel?
> 
> > 
> > Björn
> -- 
> David Kleikamp
> IBM Linux Technology Center


=====
--
A mouse is a device used to point at 
the xterm you want to type in.
Kim Alm on a.s.r.

_________________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com