[Jfs-discussion] jfs: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
Brought to you by:
blaschke-oss,
shaggyk
|
From: Christian K. <li...@ne...> - 2016-05-17 06:44:28
|
This just happend on a PowerPC (32 bit) box running Debian/stable and a
vanilla 4.6.0-rc7 kernel:
=========================================================
[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
4.6.0-rc7 #2 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------------------
kswapd0/272 just changed the state of lock:
(&jfs_ip->rdwrlock#2){++++-.}, at: [<c01f0840>] jfs_get_block+0x50/0x370
but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past:
(&jfs_ip->commit_mutex){+.+.+.}
Full dmesg & .config: http://nerdbynature.de/bits/4.6.0-rc7/
The system is still up & running and I didn't notice any ill effects so
far. The box has its root disk formatted with with JFS for a long time
now and this has never happened and I suspect an ongoing compile job must
have triggered the lockdep warning, as the box isn't normally doing much
compilation.
I found a similar report[0] from 2009 and also one in the kernel
bugzilla[1], but both are really old.
Thanks,
Christian.
[0] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0910.2/01271.html
[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13613
--
BOFH excuse #148:
Insert coin for new game
|