Re: [Jfs-discussion] JFS Resize Attempt 32.4 TiB -> 37.9 TiB Failed and somewhat hosed file-system

[Per J. <pe...@co...>]

Christian Kujau wrote:

> On Mon, 28 May 2012 at 12:40, Sandon Van Ness wrote:
>> I anticipated possible problems so before even attempting I had
>> copied all my data from my 32.4 TiB JFS file-system to my other 76.3
>> TiB JFS file-system. Here is what happened when I tried to expand the
>> file-system.
> 
> Out of curiosity (really!): why do people choose JFS for multi TB
> (production?) filesystems?

Stability and maturity?  Those are/were my primary reasons. 



-- 
Per Jessen, Zürich (17.1°C)