Re: [Jfs-discussion] [ANNOUNCE] jfsutils-1.1.15
Brought to you by:
blaschke-oss,
shaggyk
From: Sandon V. N. <sa...@va...> - 2011-04-22 12:10:40
|
On 04/22/2011 04:57 AM, Dave Kleikamp wrote: > On 04/22/2011 02:55 AM, Sandon Van Ness wrote: >> It didn't appear to be fixed on my machine so I am guessing the same >> will be for you but definitely curious to here what happens. > > Are you sure you tested the patch? The fsck output indicates that > fsck.jfs was built on March 4, but I sent the patch on March 7. > Pretty darn sure. That date is *not* the compile date but instead just the date that is listed in the source: ./include/jfs_version.h:#define JFSUTILS_DATE "04-Mar-2011" I verified my source had the patch and my binary modification time shows 1 minute after the edit time of the file from the patch: root@dekabutsu: 05:07 AM :~/jfsutils-1.1.15# ls -lsah ./libfs/log_map.c 60K -rw-r--r-- 1 root 1000 57K 2011-03-16 07:50 ./libfs/log_map.c root@dekabutsu: 05:07 AM :~/jfsutils-1.1.15# ls -lsah /sbin/fsck.jfs 1000K -rwxr-xr-x 2 root root 996K 2011-03-16 07:51 /sbin/fsck.jfs root@dekabutsu: 05:07 AM :~/jfsutils-1.1.15# so I would have to say yes, I am about 98% sure that I did have the patch applied properly. |