jflex-devel Mailing List for JFlex (Page 19)
The fast lexer generator for Java
Brought to you by:
lsf37,
steve_rowe
Menu
▾
▴
jflex-devel — developers mailing list for JFlex
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2008 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(18) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(15) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(24) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
|
| 2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
(5) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(10) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(8) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
|
May
(6) |
Jun
(28) |
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(18) |
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(10) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(18) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2019 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Gerwin K. <ger...@ni...> - 2008-01-23 21:21:58
|
Hi Steve, > I see that the Reply-To header is set to the original poster's email > address, rather than to the list, at least for the jflex-devel list. You're right, for this list, reply-to-list is better. I've changed the setting on SF. Cheers, Gerwin |
|
From: Steve R. <sa...@od...> - 2008-01-23 21:17:52
|
Hi Gerwin, I see that the Reply-To header is set to the original poster's email = address, rather than to the list, at least for the jflex-devel list. = Here is an example from one of your emails: Reply-To: ger...@ni... Is there any way for SourceForge's mailing list manager to rewrite this = header to be to the list? I'm sure one of these times when I reply to = an email I'll forget to reply-to-all, and it will go to the original = poster instead of to the list. Thanks, Steve |
|
From: Gerwin K. <ger...@ni...> - 2008-01-23 21:11:58
|
Steve Rowe wrote: > On 01/23/2008 at 3:43 PM, Gerwin Klein wrote: >> Steve Rowe wrote: >>> Related question: does it make sense to generify the CUP >>> runtime source? >> No, I'd leave them pristine. People sometimes have the cup >> jar in their class path such that their classes get loaded >> instead of the ones in the JFlex jar. >> >> The likelihood that things still work is much greater if we >> work with the unchanges sources. > > I thought there might be an issue like this - thanks for letting me know. > > So, I will *not* put back Regis' generification changes on the CUP runtime > sources. Yes, that's correct. Cheers, Gerwin |
|
From: Steve R. <sa...@od...> - 2008-01-23 21:07:02
|
On 01/23/2008 at 3:43 PM, Gerwin Klein wrote: > Steve Rowe wrote: > > Related question: does it make sense to generify the CUP > > runtime source? > > No, I'd leave them pristine. People sometimes have the cup > jar in their class path such that their classes get loaded > instead of the ones in the JFlex jar. > > The likelihood that things still work is much greater if we > work with the unchanges sources. I thought there might be an issue like this - thanks for letting me know. So, I will *not* put back Regis' generification changes on the CUP runtime sources. Steve |
|
From: Gerwin K. <ger...@ni...> - 2008-01-23 20:49:16
|
Régis Décamps wrote: > Sorry for being unresponsive, but I have new job assignments that take > me more time than before. No worries, I know the feeling ;-) > Gerwin, what roadmap do you see for JFLex? Benjamin has offered 2 > patches that he needs. I suggest to apply them inthe Java1.4 branch and > release a last version for Java 1.4 Sounds ok to me. What are the patches on? I was actually planning to release the bugfix Java 1.1 version late last year, but didn't quite make it. There is mainly one optimisation left that I need to include for the new lookahead code, otherwise the $ operator will be slow. Apart from that, everything that needs to go in is in. I'm currently pretty loaded with work, so it looks like some time in Feb now. After that we should switch mainline to the Java 1.5 branch. > The other thing I wanted to do is externalizing the ant task from the core. Will you still be working on that (there's time, we're in no particular hurry), or should we take that over? Cheers, Gerwin |
|
From: Gerwin K. <ger...@ni...> - 2008-01-23 20:43:00
|
Steve Rowe wrote: >>> All tests pass with CUP version 11a. >>> >>> Is it okay for me to commit the upgrade to the latest CUP version? >> Yes, that's fine. I wanted to upgrade anyway. > > Done. > > Related question: does it make sense to generify the CUP runtime source? No, I'd leave them pristine. People sometimes have the cup jar in their class path such that their classes get loaded instead of the ones in the JFlex jar. The likelihood that things still work is much greater if we work with the unchanges sources. Cheers, Gerwin |
|
From: <de...@us...> - 2008-01-23 14:51:21
|
SGksCgpTb3JyeSBmb3IgYmVpbmcgdW5yZXNwb25zaXZlLCBidXQgSSBoYXZlIG5ldyBqb2IgYXNz aWdubWVudHMgdGhhdCB0YWtlIG1lCm1vcmUgdGltZSB0aGFuIGJlZm9yZS4KCkdlcndpbiwgd2hh dCByb2FkbWFwIGRvIHlvdSBzZWUgZm9yIEpGTGV4PyBCZW5qYW1pbiBoYXMgb2ZmZXJlZCAyIHBh dGNoZXMKdGhhdCBoZSBuZWVkcy4gSSBzdWdnZXN0IHRvIGFwcGx5IHRoZW0gaW50aGUgSmF2YTEu NCBicmFuY2ggYW5kIHJlbGVhc2UgYQpsYXN0IHZlcnNpb24gZm9yIEphdmEgMS40CgpJbiB0aGUg SmF2YSA1IGJyYW5jaCwgbXkgY29udHJpYnV0aW9uIHdhcyBtb3N0bHkgb24gZ2VuZXJpZnlpbmcg dGhlIGNvZGUuCkNVUCB3YXMgaW5kZWVkIHRvIGJlIHVwZ3JhZGVkLiBZb3UndmUgYmVlbiB2ZXJ5 IHF1aWNrIFN0ZXZlLCBjb25ncmF0cy4gVGhlCm90aGVyIHRoaW5nIEkgd2FudGVkIHRvIGRvIGlz IGV4dGVybmFsaXppbmcgdGhlIGFudCB0YXNrIGZyb20gdGhlIGNvcmUuCgotLSAKUsOpZ2lzCgoK MjAwOC8xLzIzLCBTdGV2ZSBSb3dlIDxzYXJvd2VAb2R5c3NleS5uZXQ+Ogo+Cj4gR2Vyd2luIEts ZWluIHdyb3RlOgo+ID4gU3RldmUgUm93ZSB3cm90ZToKPiA+PiBJJ3ZlIGZpbmlzaGVkIHRoZSBn ZW5lcmlmaWNhdGlvbiBzdHVmZiBvbiB0aGUgamF2YTUgYnJhbmNoLAo+ID4KPiA+IHdvdywgdGhh dCB3YXMgcXVpY2shCj4KPiBJJ2xsIGNvbW1pdCB0aGF0IHN0dWZmIHNob3J0bHkuCj4KPiA+PiBU aGlzIG1lYW50IHRoYXQgSSBoYWQgdG8gY2hhbmdlIHRoZSBzeW50YXggdXNlZCBieSB0aGUgQW50 IHRhc2sgdG8KPiA+PiBpbnZva2UgQ1VQLCBhcyB3ZWxsIGFzIGltcG9ydCB0aGUgbmV3IGZpbGUg dmVyc2lvbnMgKGFuZCBuZXcgZmlsZXMpIG9mCj4gPj4gdGhlIENVUCBydW50aW1lIHNvdXJjZSBp bnRvIHRoZSBKRmxleCB0cmVlLgo+ID4+Cj4gPj4gQWxsIHRlc3RzIHBhc3Mgd2l0aCBDVVAgdmVy c2lvbiAxMWEuCj4gPj4KPiA+PiBJcyBpdCBva2F5IGZvciBtZSB0byBjb21taXQgdGhlIHVwZ3Jh ZGUgdG8gdGhlIGxhdGVzdCBDVVAgdmVyc2lvbj8KPiA+Cj4gPiBZZXMsIHRoYXQncyBmaW5lLiBJ IHdhbnRlZCB0byB1cGdyYWRlIGFueXdheS4KPgo+IERvbmUuCj4KPiBSZWxhdGVkIHF1ZXN0aW9u OiBkb2VzIGl0IG1ha2Ugc2Vuc2UgdG8gZ2VuZXJpZnkgdGhlIENVUCBydW50aW1lIHNvdXJjZT8K Pgo+IEkganVzdCBub3RpY2VkIGluIGxvb2tpbmcgYXQgdGhlIGNvbW1pdCBtZXNzYWdlIGZvciB0 aGUgbW9kaWZpZWQgc291cmNlCj4gZmlsZXMgdGhhdCBSw6lnaXMgbXVzdCBoYXZlIGRvbmUgc29t ZSBnZW5lcmlmaWNhdGlvbiB3b3JrIHRoZXJlLCBzaW5jZQo+IHRoZSBkaWZmIHNob3dzIGdlbmVy aWMgc3ludGF4IGJlaW5nIHJldmVydGVkIHRvIG5vbi1nZW5lcmljLiAgVGhlCj4gdmVyc2lvbnMg SSBjb21taXR0ZWQgYXJlIHVuY2hhbmdlZCBmcm9tIHRoZSBDVVAgc291cmNlcy4KPgo+IFN0ZXZl Cj4KPgo+IC0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0KPiBUaGlzIFNGLm5ldCBlbWFpbCBpcyBzcG9uc29yZWQg Ynk6IE1pY3Jvc29mdAo+IERlZnkgYWxsIGNoYWxsZW5nZXMuIE1pY3Jvc29mdChSKSBWaXN1YWwg U3R1ZGlvIDIwMDguCj4gaHR0cDovL2Nsay5hdGRtdC5jb20vTVJUL2dvL3ZzZTAxMjAwMDAwNzBt cnQvZGlyZWN0LzAxLwo+IF9fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fCj4gSmZsZXgtZGV2ZWwgbWFpbGluZyBsaXN0Cj4gSmZsZXgtZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMuc291 cmNlZm9yZ2UubmV0Cj4gaHR0cHM6Ly9saXN0cy5zb3VyY2Vmb3JnZS5uZXQvbGlzdHMvbGlzdGlu Zm8vamZsZXgtZGV2ZWwKPgo= |
|
From: Steve R. <sa...@od...> - 2008-01-23 14:00:15
|
Gerwin Klein wrote: > Steve Rowe wrote: >> I've finished the generification stuff on the java5 branch, > > wow, that was quick! I'll commit that stuff shortly. >> This meant that I had to change the syntax used by the Ant task to >> invoke CUP, as well as import the new file versions (and new files) of >> the CUP runtime source into the JFlex tree. >> >> All tests pass with CUP version 11a. >> >> Is it okay for me to commit the upgrade to the latest CUP version? > > Yes, that's fine. I wanted to upgrade anyway. Done. Related question: does it make sense to generify the CUP runtime source? I just noticed in looking at the commit message for the modified source files that Régis must have done some generification work there, since the diff shows generic syntax being reverted to non-generic. The versions I committed are unchanged from the CUP sources. Steve |
|
From: Gerwin K. <ger...@ni...> - 2008-01-21 23:52:35
|
Steve Rowe wrote: > I've finished the generification stuff on the java5 branch, wow, that was quick! > This meant that I had to change the syntax used by the Ant task to > invoke CUP, as well as import the new file versions (and new files) of > the CUP runtime source into the JFlex tree. > > All tests pass with CUP version 11a. > > Is it okay for me to commit the upgrade to the latest CUP version? Yes, that's fine. I wanted to upgrade anyway. Cheers, Gerwin |
|
From: Steve R. <sa...@od...> - 2008-01-21 23:32:33
|
Hi Gerwin, Régis,
I've finished the generification stuff on the java5 branch, but in order
to get CUP to recognize generic constructs in the parser spec., I had to
upgrade to version 11a, available from:
http://www2.in.tum.de/projects/cup/
This meant that I had to change the syntax used by the Ant task to
invoke CUP, as well as import the new file versions (and new files) of
the CUP runtime source into the JFlex tree.
All tests pass with CUP version 11a.
Is it okay for me to commit the upgrade to the latest CUP version? I
plan on doing a separate commit for this, before I commit the other Java
1.1->5 stuff.
Thanks,
Steve
|
