From: Jesse M. <jes...@gm...> - 2008-10-29 13:47:25
|
two things 1) this list is not being used anymore, use the us...@je...(this is cc'd there) 2) BoundedThreadPool has been deprecated in favor of QueuedThreadPool so give that a whirl :) cheers! jesse On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Aleksi Kallio <ale...@cs...> wrote: > Hi, > > > Of course testing will reveal if updating from 6.1.1 to 6.1.12 will > > resolve the issue, but as it is quite laborous to reproduce and not very > > repeatable, it would be nice to know a bit more about what has happened > > at the code level. > > We did now some testing. We have one Jetty instance, serving HTTP and > acting as a file broker in our system. It is an embedded Jetty with > default settings. > > When we hit 6.1.1 it with requests from 10 machines we get "dispatch > failed", and the socket closes. After updating to 6.1.11 there is no > "dispatch failed", but unfortunately Jetty is stuck anyway. > > I will keep reading the BoundedThreadPool source code and try to figure > out what is wrong. Also we will redo the testing with debug logging > enabled. > > All suggestions are of course warmly welcome. :) > > Cheers, > Aleksi > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's > challenge > Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great > prizes > Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world > http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ > _______________________________________________ > jetty-discuss mailing list > jet...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jetty-discuss > -- jesse mcconnell jes...@gm... |