[Jdlraw-discussion] jdlRaw CHANGELOG,1.49,1.50
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
jdla
|
From: Jos De L. <jd...@us...> - 2010-05-01 07:38:32
|
Update of /cvsroot/jdlraw/jdlRaw In directory sfp-cvsdas-3.v30.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20264 Modified Files: CHANGELOG Log Message: *) Added OMP to the VNG demosaicing. The end result is mathematically not *exactly* equal to the non-OMP case. However, visually, I can't see any relevant deviation. (by the way : the reason is clear : the omp case is conceived as if the photo is divided in N photos on which VNG is applied, this gives differences on the boundaries versus one photo with VNG. But I believe it is correct) I added a user option to switch on/off OMP. Index: CHANGELOG =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/jdlraw/jdlRaw/CHANGELOG,v retrieving revision 1.49 retrieving revision 1.50 diff -C2 -d -r1.49 -r1.50 *** CHANGELOG 27 Apr 2010 17:30:35 -0000 1.49 --- CHANGELOG 1 May 2010 07:38:21 -0000 1.50 *************** *** 1,5 **** ! Latest change : 20100427_1930 (manipulate me to force CVS log) $Log$ Revision 1.49 2010/04/27 17:30:35 jdla --- 1,16 ---- ! Latest change : 20100501_0900 (manipulate me to force CVS log) $Log$ + Revision 1.50 2010/05/01 07:38:21 jdla + + *) Added OMP to the VNG demosaicing. + The end result is mathematically not *exactly* equal to the non-OMP case. + However, visually, I can't see any relevant deviation. + (by the way : the reason is clear : the omp case is conceived as if + the photo is divided in N photos on which VNG is applied, this gives + differences on the boundaries versus one photo with VNG. But I believe + it is correct) + I added a user option to switch on/off OMP. + Revision 1.49 2010/04/27 17:30:35 jdla |