[Jdlraw-discussion] jdlRaw CHANGELOG,1.49,1.50

[Jos De L. <jd...@us...>]

Update of /cvsroot/jdlraw/jdlRaw
In directory sfp-cvsdas-3.v30.ch3.sourceforge.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20264

Modified Files:
	CHANGELOG 
Log Message:

*) Added OMP to the VNG demosaicing.
   The end result is mathematically not *exactly* equal to the non-OMP case.
   However, visually, I can't see any relevant deviation.
   (by the way : the reason is clear : the omp case is conceived as if
   the photo is divided in N photos on which VNG is applied, this gives
   differences on the boundaries versus one photo with VNG. But I believe
   it is correct)
   I added a user option to switch on/off OMP.



Index: CHANGELOG
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/jdlraw/jdlRaw/CHANGELOG,v
retrieving revision 1.49
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -C2 -d -r1.49 -r1.50
*** CHANGELOG	27 Apr 2010 17:30:35 -0000	1.49
--- CHANGELOG	1 May 2010 07:38:21 -0000	1.50
***************
*** 1,5 ****
! Latest change : 20100427_1930 (manipulate me to force CVS log)
  
  $Log$
  Revision 1.49  2010/04/27 17:30:35  jdla
  
--- 1,16 ----
! Latest change : 20100501_0900 (manipulate me to force CVS log)
  
  $Log$
+ Revision 1.50  2010/05/01 07:38:21  jdla
+ 
+ *) Added OMP to the VNG demosaicing.
+    The end result is mathematically not *exactly* equal to the non-OMP case.
+    However, visually, I can't see any relevant deviation.
+    (by the way : the reason is clear : the omp case is conceived as if
+    the photo is divided in N photos on which VNG is applied, this gives
+    differences on the boundaries versus one photo with VNG. But I believe
+    it is correct)
+    I added a user option to switch on/off OMP.
+ 
  Revision 1.49  2010/04/27 17:30:35  jdla