From: <ad...@jb...> - 2005-05-31 23:28:02
|
"bil...@jb..." wrote : | I understand that, but we do control the implementation of 99.99999% of used TransactionLocalDelegate implementations which was my point....The design of TransactionLocal should take advantage of this and not be designed for the 0.00001% of cases. Yes, but your argument applies to the delegate callouts, where I used the qualification "or even" The initialValue() callout is "user code". I don't see how plain synchronization on the TransactionLocal (which is a global object across all transactions) will ever be the correct thing to do. If you need to do that, you probably shouldn't be using a TransactionLocal :-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3879675#3879675 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3879675 |