From: <tho...@jb...> - 2005-03-07 21:54:55
|
The implementation leverages the requirement that the <webservice-description-name> must be unique among all <webservice-description> elements within a given deployment. It is also true that you can have multiple <port-component> elements within a <webservice-description> where the <port-component-name> must be unique as well. I still favour the current implementation where it is the responsibility of the deployer to explicitly resolve the uniqueness of the multiple service endpoints within one <webservice-description>. Adding <port-component-name> implilcitly to the <webservice-description-name> assumes that the combined path builds a valid URL and I am not a great fan of this. I'll take this issue to the JSR-109 expert group. It is undefined how the endpoint address is built for an EJB endpoint. In contrary to this, for JSE endpoints it *is* defined - you must explicitly set the URL pattern in web.xml. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3869123#3869123 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3869123 |