From: <sco...@jb...> - 2005-01-07 23:53:40
|
Max Rydahl Andersen wrote: > On Thu, 6 Jan 2005 22:41:46 +0100, Christian Bauer > <chr...@jb...> wrote: > >> This looks like the right direction, subant and filelist is what we >> need. >> >> I might be intoxicated, but I actually think about using Maven. At >> least I'd like to have this feature (and it really looks like we all >> have to use Eclipse to standardize on our own dogfood): Maven can >> produce Eclipse .project and .classpath files automatically for you >> and there is a plugin that keeps your Eclipse configuration in sync >> with them. This would be killer if it includes code style settings >> etc. as well. > > > Please no! - not Maven ,) 100% agree. I use Maven in my company and my feelings are : - maven just move the problems - the idea is cool, the implementation not - the plugins are not very well standardized - you'll have to rework some of the default plugins anyway to do what you want (the plugin itself or through a maven.xml file (kind of ant) > > If the only need/wish is for shared .project/.classpath then please > use the ant task that does that instead ! (there is a few of > these) +1 > > But AFAIK these (both the Maven and the Ant based tasks) isn't > powerfull enough to be usable,( (and I *guess* this also goes for > intellij) > > The generated files will not be able to include refs to the src and > javadocs of the used .jars, thus I'll loose the ability to step > through the source code of the external libs. Actually it's quite easy to fix considering we're using a standardized thirdparty structure and naming convention (i did that for maven) > > And that will (in my world atleast) be a serious pain-in-the-* since I > would then need to recreate those links each time I "accidently" > runs the build > and overwriting my .classpath and .project. Plus, the automatic eclipse3 build don't really like some maven actions -- Emmanuel Bernard emm...@hi... callto://emmanuelbernard http://www.hibernate.org View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3861216#3861216 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3861216 |