From: David J. <dav...@ad...> - 2003-05-22 23:28:27
|
AFAIK no one has ever used the jboss xmbean subtask from Maven. The jboss xdoclet copy is from xdoclet cvs as of an hour or so before the time they were last checked in. Thanks david jencks On 2003.05.22 18:27 Luke Taylor wrote: > Jason Dillon wrote: > > Played a tad with Maven 0.9 & I am still very impressed with the module > > > documentation which is produces from the 'site' goal. Still looks like > > > it has some issues, but then again everything has issues. I am gonna > > see how easy/difficult it will be to get Maven running to build the > core > > of JBoss and I will let y'all know. > > > > Jason, > > I was looking into Mavenising the JBoss build not so long ago and had > some success working my way through the JBoss modules and building them > as sub projects using Maven's "reactor". It seemed like it would be a > useful exercise in both finding out more about using Maven for more > complex stuff and re-familiarising myself with what was what in the > JBoss codebase these days. I had some problems with using the XDoclet > JMX stuff and the Maven plugin - the basic mbeaninterface stuff worked > OKbut I couldn't get the jboss-specific stuff to work (e.g. the > jbossxmbean subtasks). I still haven't worked out where the problem lay > - could easily be a bug because probably not many people are using this > from within Maven. I'm not familiar with the current status of the > xdoclet jars which are used withing the JBoss build either (I guess > David can clear that up). In any case it could probably be done with > straight ant tasks until the problem was resolved. > > I think it should be feasible to put together a Maven build using the > existing JBoss structure and run it in parallel for some time. This > would act as a proof of concept and allow time to iron out any problems, > standardise things and make improvements before any decision was made > about switching over. > > With the current interest I'll have a look at it again and see what I > can come up with. Let me know if you want to compare notes. > > Luke. > > -- > Luke Taylor. Monkey Machine Ltd. > PGP Key ID: 0x57E9523C http://www.monkeymachine.ltd.uk > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore. > If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a > relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore. > Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge > _______________________________________________ > Jboss-development mailing list > Jbo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > |