Menu
▾
▴
Re[2]: JBossScript was RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
|
From: julien v. <jul...@ya...> - 2003-01-14 21:56:06
|
that would be nice if deployer could create bean metadata directly without creating descriptors and then directly deploy the bean with metadata. reuse xdoclet code and generate metadata instead of writing DD that would be reparsed anyway to generate same data later. BB> Do you use XDoclet to generate your EJB files? BB> Think of writing your Bean.java file, plopping it in the jboss deploy BB> directory, and magically, the bean is ready for use. BB> Edit the Bean.java file in the deploy directory and the bean magically gets BB> redeployed with your changes. BB> Think of JSPs. That is a good analogy. JSPs get compiled into Java servlet BB> code, then compiled into a class. BB> Bill >> -----Original Message----- >> From: jbo...@li... >> [mailto:jbo...@li...]On Behalf Of >> wonder sonic >> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 4:19 PM >> To: jbo...@li... >> Subject: RE: JBossScript was RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev >> >> >> Hello, >> And what would be the goal for that? >> Could you give examples? >> >> regards, >> WS >> >> --- marc fleury <mar...@jb...> a écrit : > >> dain :) >> > >> > marcf >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: >> > jbo...@li... >> > > >> > >> [mailto:jbo...@li...] >> > On >> > > Behalf Of Bill Burke >> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:32 PM >> > > To: jbo...@li... >> > > Subject: JBossScript was RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev >> > > >> > > >> > > Anybody want to take this on? Could be an >> > interesting >> > > project. I think the idea has merit Dain. Great >> > thought. >> > > >> > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >> > > Bill Burke >> > > Chief Architect >> > > JBoss Group, LLC >> > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >> > > >> > > >> > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > From: >> > jbo...@li... >> > > > >> > >> [mailto:jbo...@li...]On >> > Behalf Of >> > > > Bill Burke >> > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:26 PM >> > > > To: jbo...@li... >> > > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > Its a good idea. Anybody want to implement >> > this? >> > > JBossScript we can >> > > > call it. >> > > > >> > > > Bill >> > > > >> > > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > > From: >> > jbo...@li... >> > > > > >> > >> [mailto:jbo...@li...]On >> > >> > > Behalf Of >> > > > > Dain Sundstrom >> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:16 PM >> > > > > To: jbo...@li... >> > > > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Bill, >> > > > > >> > > > > This reminds me of an I deal I has last night >> > (couldn't >> > > sleep). I >> > > > > was thinking of the script based MBean support >> > Sacha added, and I >> > > > > thought can we make plain old java work like a >> > scripting >> > > language. >> > > > > Here is what I came up with: >> > > > > + The user writes a class BlahService.java >> > > > > + This source file is places in our >> > deployment directory >> > > > > + We run Xdoclet on it to generate the >> > MBean >> > > deployment descriptor >> > > > > + We compile the java file >> > > > > + Deploy >> > > > > >> > > > > Java as a scripting language. >> > > > > >> > > > > What do you think? >> > > > > >> > > > > -dain >> > > > > >> > > > > On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 12:50 PM, >> > Bill Burke wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > > The only negative comment I have in using >> > JMX is that the PHP >> > > > > > community may have a tough time switching >> > over to Nukes >> > > on JBoss >> > > > > > if you have to have a >> > > > > > package structure like a SAR or a WAR. I >> > hate to say >> > > it, but does it >> > > > > > need >> > > > > > to be "dumbed-down" for the PHP community? >> > This type >> > > of community >> > > > > > needs to >> > > > > > be able to edit a JSP and immediately see >> > the change on >> > > the webserver. >> > > > > > Is >> > > > > > it possible to be all JSP based for themes, >> > modules and >> > > blocks? You >> > > > > > could >> > > > > > use a URL fragement and JSP:Include to >> > decide what theme to use. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Just a thought. Maybe JMX and such is the >> > way to go. >> > > Just want >> > > > > > to give you something to think about. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Bill >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> -----Original Message----- >> > > > > >> From: >> > jbo...@li... >> > > > > >> >> > > >> > >> [mailto:jbo...@li...]On >> > Behalf >> > > > > >> Of julien viet >> > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:31 AM >> > > > > >> To: SourceForge.net >> > > > > >> Subject: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> hi folks, >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> JNuke adventure has started. >> > > > > >> After analysis of PostNuke I've began the >> > development, still >> > > > > >> early though. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> I keep everything that's good in PostNuke >> > and throw >> > > all the shit >> > > > > >> away : >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> modules, blocks, permissions system, url >> > system and themes. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> JMX is used for PostNuke components : >> > themes, >> > > > > >> modules and blocks are all JMX mbeans. Here >> > are my reasons : >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> A : general >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> 1.we need a component structure, why not >> > JMX ? after all >> > > > > >> another forum say that's lightweight. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> 2.theses components do not have to scale, >> > i.e the >> > > number of modules, >> > > > > >> blocks and themes is very small. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> B : for modules >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> 1.Ability to deploy/undeploy when >> > application is running. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> 2.It's easy to deploy additional modules >> > as a separate >> > > > deployment and >> > > > > >> have them register in the same registry. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> 3.PostNuke is all about invoking module >> > functions. >> > > > > >> Url like >> > index.php?module=User&op=register means >> > > > > >> that the PN must call the method >> > register on module User. >> > > > > >> For me that means that the servlet >> > retrieves the mbean >> > > > > >> under the name >> > jnuke:publicmodules:name=User >> > > > > >> and invokes the operation register(). >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> 4.When a module is installed and >> > configured it plug >> > > > > >> block mbeans in the JMX. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> C : for blocks, same reasons as above >> > except 3 and 4 >> > > > > >> as invocation is typed for 3. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> D : for themes, same reasons as above >> > except 3 and 4 >> > > > > >> as invocation is typed for 3. >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> EJB are used for the model : >> > >> === message truncated === >> >> ___________________________________________________________ >> Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! >> Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving >> your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL >> certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get >> started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en >> _______________________________________________ >> Jboss-development mailing list >> Jbo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development BB> ------------------------------------------------------- BB> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving BB> your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL BB> certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get BB> started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en BB> _______________________________________________ BB> Jboss-development mailing list BB> Jbo...@li... BB> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development -- Best regards, julien mailto:jul...@ya... ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com |