Re: [JBoss-dev] XDoclet todo...

[Dmitri C. <di...@bi...>]

> You should be able to do the following:
> /**
>    * blah
>    */
>  public void myMethod()
>  {
>     /** @todo put something here */
>  }

Are you saying _should_ or _can_?  afaik (although to be honest I haven't
tested it), the javadoc engine only supports class/interface/method level
nodes.  That is where I see the limitation being.  Hence when xjavadoc
replaces the sun javadoc engine, this may be possible.

cheers
dim

>
> Ken
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dmitri Colebatch" <di...@bi...>
> To: "Jason Dillon" <ja...@pl...>;
> <jbo...@li...>
> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2002 10:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] XDoclet todo...
>
>
> > > This is really for the xdoclet list, but I am too lazy to find the
> > > address for that (plus lots of them listen here too).
> > >
> > > Is there any easy way to allow xdoclet to search for tags inside of
> > > methods too?  For example, I find it much easier to put the TODO,
where
> > > the code should go, but I would like to keep using @todo.
> > >
> > > /**
> > >   * blah
> > >   */
> > > public void myMethod()
> > > {
> > >    /// @todo put something here
> > > }
> >
> > Not at the moment, because XDoclet's tree come's from Sun's javadoc
> engine.
> >
> > perhaps this could be added when the xjavadoc module is in use (the same
> one that is going to allow in-vm generaetion :)
> >
> > cheers
> > dim
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > Jbo...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>