Re: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-517786 ] OBJECT_NAME is now an ObjectName

[Jason D. <ja...@pl...>]

Yes it should.  Thanks for catching this.

--jason


On Sat, 2002-02-16 at 08:07, Francisco Reverbel wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2002 no...@so... wrote:
> 
> > Change Notes item #517786, was opened at 2002-02-14 16:52
> > You can respond by visiting: 
> > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=381174&aid=517786&group_id=22866
> > 
> > Category: None
> > Group: v3.0 (Rabbit Hole)
> > Status: Open
> > Priority: 5
> > Submitted By: Jason Dillon (user57)
> > Assigned to: Jason Dillon (user57)
> > Summary: OBJECT_NAME is now an ObjectName
> > 
> > Initial Comment:
> > All MBean interfaces that declared a OBJECT_NAME
> > constant have been updated to use ObjectName instead of
> > a String.  The value assigned is created from the
> > org.jboss.util.ObjectNameFactory, which will translate
> 
> Shouldn't it be org.jboss.util.jmx.ObjectNameFactory ?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Francisco
> 
> > any MalformedObjectNameExceptions into Errors.
> > 
> > Clients that used these fields will need to update
> > there code to not wrap OBJECT_NAME in a new
> > ObjectName() instance.
> >