[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of JBoss Remoting, Unified Invokers] - Re: remaining issues with multiplex transport for 1.4.0 fina

[timfox <do-...@jb...>]

"ad...@jb..." wrote : "timfox" wrote : On my local copy of remoting I have replaced the Thread.sleep(500) "anti-pattern" line with Thread.yield(), which is the proper way of waiting in a loop for a condition with hogging the cpu IMHO.
  |   | 
  | 
  | Both are wrong.

As usual, you're right :)

I think there's something about this in Josh Bloch's effecctive Java book?

View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3918632#3918632

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3918632