[Jboss-dev-forums] [Design of Management Features on JBoss] - Re: Fix for JBAS-2651 (Restore stable JSR77 names for ejbs)

[<sco...@jb...>]

I don't think we should be using the jndi name at all in the jsr77 name. An ejb having only local interfaces or an mdb has no reason for a jndi name. Its a jboss implementation detail that could change in the future so we need a non-implementation detail based name. For the jsr77 names, we can simply use the ejb-name because the jsr77 structure requires that this be unique due to the fact that it is scoped by the EJBModule (EJBModule, J2EEApplication, J2EEServer). The same is not true of the ejb container jmx name pattern, which is why we used the jndi name.

I'm not following the problem with the J2EEDomain. Can you give an example of what you mean.


View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3917413#3917413

Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3917413