You can subscribe to this list here.
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(157) |
May
(789) |
Jun
(608) |
Jul
(554) |
Aug
(868) |
Sep
(654) |
Oct
(994) |
Nov
(803) |
Dec
(982) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 |
Jan
(1006) |
Feb
(1054) |
Mar
(1345) |
Apr
(1305) |
May
(1392) |
Jun
(1016) |
Jul
(265) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(19) |
2007 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(13) |
2008 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(51) |
2009 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(47) |
May
(38) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(17) |
2010 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(10) |
2011 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(29) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(38) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(27) |
2012 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(50) |
Aug
(35) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(68) |
Nov
(79) |
Dec
(45) |
2013 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(52) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(12) |
2014 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(5) |
2015 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(1) |
2016 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(7) |
2017 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: oberon777 <nu...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 18:13:04
|
Also, is the situation any different for "callee" pointcuts? It is possible to query the calling method for the line #? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881656#3881656 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881656 |
From: oberon777 <nu...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 18:11:51
|
You mean, line # information is never recorded at all?.. This is a little surprising because I would think that this is not an uncommon requirement to disambiguate based on the call site. -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881654#3881654 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881654 |
From: ejannsen <nu...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 18:00:31
|
Thanks for the info mholzner. I looked into various other ways such as using PortletRequestDispatcher or the ActionResponse.sendRedirect() method. But found they only worked for pages on the same server or reloaded the browser window entirely. The IFRAME tag seems to be a nice clean solution and is working fine. Thanks View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881653#3881653 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881653 |
From: <kab...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 17:56:32
|
"oberon777" wrote : Is there a way to get call site information (line number, etc.) from a CallerInvocation? | No "oberon777" wrote : Also is there some sort of a Wrapper interface for getting arguments and the called method/constructor from a CallerInvocation? All sublasses seem to define means for doing so. | You need to cast it to the correct subclass (MethodCallefByMethodInvocation etc.) and access the methods from there. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881652#3881652 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881652 |
From: oberon777 <nu...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 17:38:57
|
Is there a way to get call site information (line number, etc.) from a CallerInvocation? Also is there some sort of a Wrapper interface for getting arguments and the called method/constructor from a CallerInvocation? All sublasses seem to define means for doing so. Thanks. -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881648#3881648 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881648 |
From: <sco...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 16:02:57
|
See the "JDK java.util.logging" section on http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Logging There are no plans to use the jdk logging as the native logging api. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881632#3881632 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881632 |
From: iwadasn <nu...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 15:54:10
|
Is there a plan for JBoss to use the logging provided by java.util.logging? We currently use this for logging, and we would like to be able to integrate our logging with the logging from the appserver itself. This would be much easier if we could do it using the standard package, rather than needing to configure and use Log4J. Does the JBoss team have any plans to eliminate Log4J, especially now that java.util.logging has been around for a few years. I posted this here, as it is not so much of a "how does this work..." style question, more of a "do you intend to design in this technology" type question. Thanks. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881630#3881630 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881630 |
From: <ad...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 15:01:20
|
"ale...@jb..." wrote : | I am not entirely clear about the other question. | As I understand it, there is a schema which is already bound. And you want to use that schema's types in your other schema and override type bindings from the first schema? Yes. I want to sort of inherit your complex type into my namespace and specialize it (name the classes or maybe override the annotations?). And also let the user choose what type of entry binding they would like to use (the short form or the long form) depending upon whether the values are Strings or something more complex? i.e. JBossXB provides some template types for some of the more common use cases. I was merely asking whether such a thing is possible (even it it requires creating some special jbxb annotations to define it?). The two advantages are: 1) I don't have to do all the work of defining what a map means 2) Consistency of form across our schemas. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881612#3881612 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881612 |
From: comodi <nu...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 13:58:51
|
Hi to all, here my situation: i'm working with JBoss 3.2.5 clustering (yes i know it's a little bit old but i must use this ver.). In my current configuration i have two partitions: a DefaultPartition and a CustomPartition (but probably i will have more than two...). My question is: is there a method that returns all partitions (name and other infos)? and/or return respective partition's members? I found and used HAPartition.getCurrentView() to return the vector with current members, but how can i access to other partitions? Thanks to all, and sorry for my "scolastic" english a for my newbie questions. L. P.S. if my questions are not clear please tell me, i'll be happy to give all details. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881596#3881596 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881596 |
From: zeroconf <nu...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 12:40:57
|
Hi all, Is there a way provided by JBoss Portal to let a user place and arrange portlets (more or less interactively) on portal pages to customize his workspace. I'd like to know if this is possible without editing some *-pages.xml or *-portal.xml files by hand. Thanks in advance View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881582#3881582 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881582 |
From: <ale...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 12:15:19
|
AFAIU, this style needs support for element group binding which is not supported yet. But I'll look into how hard it would be to add this and let you know. I am not entirely clear about the other question. As I understand it, there is a schema which is already bound. And you want to use that schema's types in your other schema and override type bindings from the first schema? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881578#3881578 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881578 |
From: timfox <nu...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 07:33:24
|
Hi Guys- The code I committed for createQueue/createSession only returns a reference to an existing topic or session that's already been configured when called from JMS - i.e. you can't use it from the JMS API to actually create a topic or session, as per JMS spec. It currently throws an exception if you attempt to call it witht a queue/topic name that doesn't exist. I also put in some code to actually create a queue/session but that isn't visible via the JMS API. This is the boolean parameter on the create call that is always false for calls via JMS. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881530#3881530 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881530 |
From: manjuns <nu...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 07:16:35
|
Hi, In XDoclet is it possible to generate the PropertyResourceBundle files from Java Source Code.. something like this. class Test{ /** * xdoclet tag.. */ public static String HELLO_MSG = "Hello Welcome"; } this should generate mymessage.properties with entries HELLO_MSG="Hello Welcome" Can you please give information how to achive this.. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881527#3881527 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881527 |
From: <sco...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 02:25:49
|
In working on generating thirdparty from the repository I have run into this problem. If I update the secondary-dependency-test.xml to include multiple component-refs that depend on apache-logging (here jgroups and tomcat): | <componentref name="hibernate" | version="3.0.5" /> | <componentref name="jgroups" | version="2.2.7" /> | <componentref name="tomcat" | version="5.5.9" /> | the build fails because there are multiple synchronize.apache-logging targets: | [starksm@banshee9100 jbossas]$ ant -buildfile secondary-dependency-test.xml | Buildfile: secondary-dependency-test.xml | [null] Created dir: C:\cvs\JBossHead\jboss-build\thirdparty\jgroups\2.2.7 | [null] Getting: http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/repository/jgroups/2.2.7/component-info.xml | [null] To: C:\cvs\JBossHead\jboss-build\thirdparty\jgroups\2.2.7\component-info.xml | [null] Created dir: C:\cvs\JBossHead\jboss-build\thirdparty\tomcat\5.5.9 | [null] Getting: http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/repository/tomcat/5.5.9/component-info.xml | [null] To: C:\cvs\JBossHead\jboss-build\thirdparty\tomcat\5.5.9\component-info.xml | [null] Created dir: C:\cvs\JBossHead\jboss-build\thirdparty\apache-logging\1.0.4jboss | [null] Getting: http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/repository/apache-logging/1.0.4jboss/component-info.xml | [null] To: C:\cvs\JBossHead\jboss-build\thirdparty\apache-logging\1.0.4jboss\component-info.xml. | [null] Getting: http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/repository/apache-logging/1.0.4jboss/component-info.xml | [null] To: C:\cvs\JBossHead\jboss-build\thirdparty\apache-logging\1.0.4jboss\component-info.xml. | [null] Created dir: C:\cvs\JBossHead\jboss-build\thirdparty\apache-modeler\1.1 | [null] Getting: http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/repository/apache-modeler/1.1/component-info.xml | [null] To: C:\cvs\JBossHead\jboss-build\thirdparty\apache-modeler\1.1\component-info.xml. | [null] Created dir: C:\cvs\JBossHead\jboss-build\thirdparty\commons-el\1.0 | [null] Getting: http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/repository/commons-el/1.0/component-info.xml | [null] To: C:\cvs\JBossHead\jboss-build\thirdparty\commons-el\1.0\component-info.xml | . | BUILD FAILED | C:\cvs\JBossHead\jboss-build\jbossas\secondary-dependency-test.xml:38: Duplicate | target: `synchronize.apache-logging' | | There needs to be some tracking of whether a synchronization target has already been added. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881510#3881510 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881510 |
From: <sco...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 01:40:20
|
So the standard cluster-service.xml config should come with the multicast group parameterized as well then: | <mbean code="org.jboss.ha.framework.server.ClusterPartition" | name="jboss:service=${jboss.partition.name:DefaultPartition}"> | | <!-- Name of the partition being built --> | <attribute name="PartitionName">${jboss.partition.name:DefaultPartition}</attribute> | ... | <Config> | <UDP mcast_addr="${jboss.partition.udpGroup:228.1.2.3}" mcast_port="45566" | | This is a sufficiently general configuration issue. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881508#3881508 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881508 |
From: <ovi...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 00:40:09
|
http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBMESSAGING-91 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881503#3881503 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881503 |
From: mholzner <nu...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 00:19:58
|
one cheap way is to use an iframe (the portlet renders an iframe tag, that points to that other site); this approach does hav som elimitations though... Othewrwise it gets tricky very fast, since you'll have to rewrite any urls in the remote site, if you want to stay in the middle. WSRP is the the way to go (if the remote site offers to act as a wsrp producer) , but that won't be available in JBoss Portal until version 2.2 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881502#3881502 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881502 |
From: <ad...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 00:18:40
|
No they are for creating javax.jms.Destinations (the identities) not the backend objects. You should look at having special destinations to allow administrator over the jms protocol itself. A number of other jms servers do this. e.g. You can send a request/response message to the "AdminQueue" that says create me a destination or change my password, etc. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881501#3881501 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881501 |
From: <ad...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 00:14:52
|
"ad...@jb..." wrote : | The problem is that they actually communicate over the udp groups, | so the ip binding does not matter. | Of course I assume that the bind addresses are reachable from one another which is the case at least in our lab. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881500#3881500 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881500 |
From: <ad...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 00:04:39
|
"sco...@jb..." wrote : | Also, every server start macro does bind the server to a specific address using the -b option as far as I know. The problem is that localhost is used for the tests target. | Only because I fixed this yesterday. I didn't even check them all, just the unit tests. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881499#3881499 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881499 |
From: <ad...@jb...> - 2005-06-15 00:02:21
|
The problem is caused not because the multicast aren't bound to the jboss.bind.address (they are). This allows multiple servers to boot on the same machine. The problem is that they actually communicate over the udp groups, so the ip binding does not matter. Any servers on the same machine or network are going to form a cluster which is not what you want when you have two or more people trying to run isolated tests. To properly isolate the indepenent tests, you need a simple notion to isolate the udp groups. e.g. Each user gets their own mcast address and then they can use ports within that address. As Clebert said, a simple jboss.mcast.address should solve the problem? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881498#3881498 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881498 |
From: <ovi...@jb...> - 2005-06-14 23:59:54
|
createQueue()/createTopics() are not provided for creating destinations on the server, but creating destination identities "for the rare cases where clients need to dynamically manipulate queue identity". I don't think the methods should create physical destinations. JMS javadoc specifically says it shouldn't, anyway. I modified the code accordingly. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881497#3881497 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881497 |
From: <cle...@jb...> - 2005-06-14 23:57:44
|
This is to the UDP IPs. It's very common having conflicts between different runnings when both are running the testsuite in the same environment/network. (for example dev01, 2 and 3). I didn't mean specifically to change our distribution, but to have some way to isolate different clustered UDPs as Adrian has mentioned: anonymous wrote : 2) Issues with some services using udp (e.g. clustering) that will still pickup requests | that are intended for a specific machine running the testsuite. This is for the same | problem as (1), but also on the same network where you want to control the | machines in the cluster. | I don't know really how to resolve this one. Since you are basically with broadcast | ports that need to be isolated across different users on the same network. | Some sort of mechanism like DHCP where you can lease udp socket/ports? :-) | So, that's why I suggested the creation of the property. We would do a in those cluster UDP configs if the property is available. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881496#3881496 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881496 |
From: <sco...@jb...> - 2005-06-14 23:40:30
|
There should be no need to service specific bind address properties. Every service should already be defaulting its bind address to the jboss.bind.address property. Where do you see a need for a service specific bind address? Also, every server start macro does bind the server to a specific address using the -b option as far as I know. The problem is that localhost is used for the tests target. The client side of the tests is what is needed most as there are many hard coded localhost references. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881495#3881495 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881495 |
From: <cle...@jb...> - 2005-06-14 22:15:50
|
For 2) What about defining a property like jboss.tomcat.udp.bind and jboss.ejb.udp.bind, in the same way we do to jboss.bind.address? Or we could at least do some replace into /build/output/server/relevant-places. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3881490#3881490 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3881490 |