Menu
▾
▴
jboss-dev-forums — The jboss development forum posts
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(157) |
May
(789) |
Jun
(608) |
Jul
(554) |
Aug
(868) |
Sep
(654) |
Oct
(994) |
Nov
(803) |
Dec
(982) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 |
Jan
(1006) |
Feb
(1054) |
Mar
(1345) |
Apr
(1305) |
May
(1392) |
Jun
(1016) |
Jul
(265) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(8) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(32) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(21) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(18) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(51) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(25) |
Feb
(26) |
Mar
(34) |
Apr
(47) |
May
(38) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(26) |
Apr
(49) |
May
(52) |
Jun
(48) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(39) |
Jun
(36) |
Jul
(29) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(38) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(29) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(46) |
Jul
(50) |
Aug
(35) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(68) |
Nov
(79) |
Dec
(45) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(67) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(52) |
May
(25) |
Jun
(25) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(36) |
Jun
(26) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(19) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(7) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
(19) |
Apr
(34) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(19) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(12) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Iapetus999 <nu...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 18:21:28
|
Here's my jboss-service.xml file: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> | <!-- $Id: jboss-service.xml,v 1.3.2.3 2005/06/19 07:08:07 bill Exp $ --> | | <!-- ===================================================================== --> | <!-- JBoss Server Configuration --> | <!-- ===================================================================== --> | | <server> | | <mbean code="org.jboss.aop.deployment.AspectManagerService" | name="jboss.aop:service=AspectManager"> | <attribute name="EnableLoadtimeWeaving">true</attribute> | <!-- only relevant when EnableLoadtimeWeaving is true. | When transformer is on, every loaded class gets | transformed. If AOP can't find the class, then it | throws an exception. Sometimes, classes may not have | all the classes they reference. So, the Suppressing | is needed. (i.e. Jboss cache in the default configuration --> | <attribute name="SuppressTransformationErrors">false</attribute> | <attribute name="Prune">true</attribute> | <attribute name="Include">org.jboss.test</attribute> | <attribute name="Exclude">org.jboss.</attribute> | <attribute name="Optimized">true</attribute> | <attribute name="Verbose">true</attribute> | </mbean> | | <mbean code="org.jboss.aop.deployment.AspectDeployer" | name="jboss.aop:service=AspectDeployer"> | </mbean> | | </server> | View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883715#3883715 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883715 |
|
From: Iapetus999 <nu...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 18:13:36
|
Everything seems to be good...my -aop.xml file is getting deployed: 11:05:28,600 [-10.0.0.220] INFO yment.AspectDeployer - Deployed AOP: file:/C:/apps/jboss-4.0.1sp1/server/marble/tmp/deploy/tmp14669Marble.ear-contents/annotations.aop | I put a breakpoint on AspectXmlDeployer.deployXML and my xml file is getting deployed. BUT when I run my app, none of my aspects work. No method/field interceptors get called. I just upgraded to aop 1.3 jdk5 on 4.0.1sp1 Any ideas what could be going wrong? What should I be looking for? That's the only line in the log that I see from aop during my app deployment. The only thing I did was to copy the jboss-aop-jdk5.deployer to my server/app/deploy/ directory. Is there something else I need to do? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883713#3883713 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883713 |
|
From: <tom...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 17:27:13
|
Is the server address the same from the outside client as on the server itself? For example, is the server binding to some internal address like 192.169.1.1? If so, the client won't be able to connect to this address outside of the server network. Will have to specify clientConnectAddress within the server configuration (see http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=Remoting_Transports_Configuration for more details). View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883707#3883707 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883707 |
|
From: <bil...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 16:26:43
|
Oh, but you need JBoss AOP 1.3.0 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883702#3883702 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883702 |
|
From: <bil...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 16:26:20
|
Filtering will have the greatest effect on bootup performance with loadtime weaving: http://docs.jboss.com/aop/1.3/aspect-framework/reference/en/html/running.html#d0e2923 The "exclude" property is available as an attribute of the AspectManagerService as well if you are running within JBoss. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883701#3883701 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883701 |
|
From: w18666 <nu...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 16:08:28
|
I am trying the Fibo example on JBoss-IDE Tutorial Guide, after I configured the XDoclet follow the instruction, it didn't generate any home or remote interface, I checked all my configuration, they match the instruction, and I checked xdoclet-build.xml itself, it complain "Error, element type homeinfterface must be declared", same at remoteinterface, seems it doesn't recongnize them, can someone advise, thanks a lot. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883698#3883698 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883698 |
|
From: <ben...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 15:30:08
|
That is true to reduce publicly accessible methods. But we want to make sure that the classes are not accidentally bundled into the source package. E.g., under aop, there are pojos like Payload and Person that are not test cases but helper classes instead. -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883695#3883695 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883695 |
|
From: neil_g_avery <nu...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 15:29:23
|
Hi All, Is it possible to restrict the transformation scope of those classes that are weaved upon startup? As we are adding more jars to our application startup times degrade because there are more classes to weave. We only want to weave those classes in our application and none of the third-party jars...is there an equivalent to the following or a means of restricting the work done during weave-time? <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> Regards Neil. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883694#3883694 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883694 |
|
From: neil_g_avery <nu...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 15:00:46
|
Ive got it working the correct syntax was
| <interceptor class="org.neo.swarm.interceptor.within.WithinAspect"/>
| <bind pointcut="execution(* $instanceof{@org.neo.swarm.interceptor.within.InterceptWithin}->*())">
| <advice name="execute"
| aspect="org.neo.swarm.interceptor.within.WithinAspect"/>
| </bind>
Cheers Neil.
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883690#3883690
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883690
|
|
From: <sco...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 14:56:36
|
It looks ok, but until the libraries.ent is generated and we can actually get the codebase to compile and tested I can't say for sure. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883688#3883688 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883688 |
|
From: <cle...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 14:08:36
|
Please... make sure that the build.xml from the testsuite still working after your refactoring ;-) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883680#3883680 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883680 |
|
From: <ju...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 14:03:34
|
very nice theme View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883678#3883678 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883678 |
|
From: yxyang <nu...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 14:02:19
|
I think lots of people have these requirement. Unfortunately, currently version 2.0 doesn't provide convenient ways. But it is doable by yourself. inter-portlet communication can be implemented by session attribute. I have a simple website which can demo these www.mobmeee.com. regards yang View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883676#3883676 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883676 |
|
From: JBossUser <nu...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 13:56:06
|
We currently implementing a Portal based on Portlets following the JSR168 ?standard?. The requirements of our application enforces the communication between portlets, therefore we are investigating solutions that support this in a way that conforms to our needs. It would be great help if someone can answer us the following questions so that we can use these answers for decision making: General: a) Does the product support communication between JSR 168 based portlets or only proprietary portlets? b) If both are supported, to which extent is communication for ?standard? and proprietary portlets implemented? Communication a) Is communication between local and remote portlets possible? b) Between portlets from different applications? c) Is a declarative component model used? d) Is communication between portlets on different pages possible? e) Can the user dynamically decide to which portlet the data should be sent? f) Is it possible to define wires between portlets? g) Is it possible to define wires to remote portlets? Navigation a) Is it possible to define menu entries for portlets that are integrated in the portal page? b) Is this for local and remote portlets possible? c) How is this solved for remote portlets? Thanks for your help. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883673#3883673 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883673 |
|
From: fabcipriano <nu...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 13:12:07
|
I think that the JSR88 JBoss needs a "permanet" deployment for pragmatic re= asons. Reading a suggestion from Dimitris in the http://www.jboss.org/index.html?m= odule=3Dbb&op=3Dviewtopic&t=3D61945&postdays=3D0&postorder=3Dasc&start=3D10= he said : " In the DeploymentService prototype we recently added a uploadLibrary(URL = src, String filename) method, it would be easy to add a similar uploadModul= e(url, filename). " So instead use the MainDeployer.deploy method I=C2=B4m thinking to use the = DeploymentService.uploadModule to make the deployment in the JSR88 JBoss. This form the deployment will be done by URLScanner and there is a little p= roblem here. We dont know when URLScanner finished your job. So to resolve = this problem we will need a start and stop JMX events from MainDeployer to = know whwn a deployment module is finished. I hope to implement this soon and suggestions are appreciated.=20 Thanks, Fabiano. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=3Dbb&op=3Dv= iewtopic&p=3D3883661#3883661 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=3Dbb&op=3Dpostin= g&mode=3Dreply&p=3D3883661 |
|
From: <chr...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 12:59:55
|
Since this "benchmark" has been written by someone who admits that he doesn't know anything about Hibernate, you won't get much usable information out of it. This particular thing has been debunked internally by a member of our team in 15 minutes - with now Hibernate being "100x faster". There is just no value in publishing this, since it would a) encourage others to waste our time again with similar stuff and b) cost more of our time than it is worth. We get many benchmarks like this from competing vendors (note that this is particular benchmark very likely encouraged and/or sponsored by an object database vendor) and we don't have the time to debunk them all. We encourage you to create your own benchmarks if you want objective results. Some trivial micro-benchmarks that show the real JDBC overhead for unrealistic non-concurrent data access are available in the Hibernate distribution, as the "ant perftest" target. Some links: http://www.hibernate.org/157.html http://www.hibernate.org/15.html View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883658#3883658 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883658 |
|
From: neil_g_avery <nu...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 11:00:11
|
Im using jboss-aop 1.1.2 View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883643#3883643 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883643 |
|
From: neil_g_avery <nu...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 10:58:13
|
Hi All,
Ive been trying to use a class level TYPE annotations to work with java 5 but have had no luck. Digging through the tests I found the instanceofannotated test package which works only for pre java 5.
The binding between the TYPE annotation and interceptor doesnt occur and my interceptor never gets called - can anyone tell me what Im doing
wrong?
ps. I would like to use an aspect rather than an interceptor; which is where i started before copying the examples - so some of the naming looks a little confused.
Regards Neil.
jboss-aop.xml
<aop>
| <!-- <aspect class="org.neo.swarm.interceptor.within.WithinAspect" scope="PER_INSTANCE" /> -->
|
| <interceptor name="aspect" class="org.neo.swarm.interceptor.within.WithinAspectInterceptor"/>
|
| <bind pointcut="execution(String $instanceof{@org.neo.swarm.interceptor.within.InterceptWithin}->doStuff())">
| <interceptor-ref name="aspect"/>
| </bind>
| </aop>
annotation def
| @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
| @Target(ElementType.TYPE)
| public @interface InterceptWithin {
|
| }
|
interceptor
| public class WithinAspectInterceptor implements Interceptor {
|
| public WithinAspectInterceptor(){
| System.err.println("created interceptor");
| }
| public String getName() {
| return "aspect";
| }
|
| public Object invoke(Invocation invocation) throws Throwable {
| System.err.println("Interceptor within got called with:" + invocation);
| return invocation.invokeNext();
| }
| }
the annotated test component
@InterceptWithin
| public class SomeComponent {
| public String doStuff(){
| return "stuff";
| }
|
| }
the test
public void testWithin() throws Exception {
| SomeComponent component = new SomeComponent();
| component.doStuff();
|
| }
|
View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883642#3883642
Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883642
|
|
From: <man...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 10:33:53
|
The court ruling shall hold then, defendant Bela. :) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883637#3883637 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883637 |
|
From: <be...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 10:27:48
|
No objections your honor View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883634#3883634 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883634 |
|
From: <man...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 09:39:55
|
Hi, At the moment functional unit tests are in tests/functional/ and the actual tests are in a .test sub-package, e.g., org.jboss.cache.tests.loader. It would make more sense that the test package mirror the package of the classes under test, so that test cases have access to package-level variables and methods of the classes under test, removing the number of publicly accessible methods. Does anyone have any objections to my refactoring these packages accordingly? Cheers, Manik View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883626#3883626 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883626 |
|
From: hr_stoyanov <nu...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 08:24:31
|
I checked the benchmarks published at this site: http://www.polepos.org/ and the performance charts for Hibernate/EJB 3.0, compared to raw JDBC access for the same databases, does not look goog at all. Anyone care to comment? ... And please, no flames - I need objective information for a project, where RDBMS throughtput is critical. Thanks in advance, Hristo View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883620#3883620 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883620 |
|
From: <ovi...@jb...> - 2005-07-05 01:28:45
|
The scoped AspectDeployer and AspectManager deploy correctly, as I previously said. The problem comes from the fact that there is no way (or I don't now of any) to defer the deployment of an embedded -aop.xml file until all services from that deployment unit are started. Because of that, my jms-aop.xml will be deployed by the jboss-aop.deployer "jboss.aop:service=AspectDeployer" and my aspects will go to "jboss.aop:service=AspectManager", because my own AspectDeployer will be only registered with the MainDeployer AFTER jms-aop.xml finds its deployer. My solution was to create a helper service (AspectLoader) and use it to explicitely deploy aspects with my AspectDeployer. jms-aop.xml also gets deployed by "jboss.aop:service=AspectDeployer", but that's secondary, since I won't look up my aspects there. I would have attached a working example, if forums permitted that. IF you know a more elegant solution, please let me know. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883607#3883607 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883607 |
|
From: <max...@jb...> - 2005-07-04 21:40:44
|
so, WTP M5 seem to have change stuff so now xml editors doesnt work (at least not by default ;) See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=102688 for details (p.s. its stuff like this that makes it hard for us to put out releases on latest milestones from eclipse...) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883595#3883595 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883595 |
|
From: patrickdalla <nu...@jb...> - 2005-07-04 19:04:44
|
I'm using postgresql for storing content. can it be a database configuration? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3883578#3883578 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3883578 |
1965 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
