|
From: Gerardo H. <ma...@pr...> - 2004-07-18 01:42:42
|
I believe it might be a good idea to support the OWL Abstract Syntax ( http://www.w3c.org/TR/owl-absyn/syntax.html ), as it is easier to type and read than N3. Unfortunately, Jena does not have an abstract syntax parser :( So we probably should write our own parser. My own preference is to use JavaCC because I already know how to use it, but the Antlr is already a part of Jena (and it is in our CVS!) so it might be better to just use Antlr. Here is the Antlr home page: http://www.antlr.org/ It seems to be pretty good. And the documentation is much better than JavaCC's... What are your thoughts on this? -- Gerardo Horvilleur ma...@mu... |