Re: [javagroups-users] discarded message from different group
Brought to you by:
belaban
|
From: Ricardo T. <ric...@em...> - 2005-03-21 17:17:48
|
I agree with your point. However, in our case (we are not using a cluster), we just have several distributed apps that generate events, and each of them sends them to a rpc group, them a different (supervision) application is a subscriber to all of the groups and receives them all. perhaps what is wrong is our usage of jgroups. would there be a different (better) way to do it ? should we use just one group ? thanks Ricardo Bela Ban wrote: > What do you suggest ? I don't want to downgrade the level to TRACE or > DEBUG, because I *want* to make sure people understand that different > clusters are seeing > their traffic, sometimes this is something people just overlooked and > *want* to fix > > Ricardo Trindade wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> The problem is I get the WARN log message... >> >> thanks >> Ricardo >> >> >> Bela Ban wrote: >> >>> Ok, so then you'll get all the traffic. The transport protocol will >>> then discard traffic generated from a cluster other than the one >>> you're connected to >>> >>> Ricardo Trindade wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've read a bit more and noticed Bela suggests changing the >>>> multicast address. >>>> But in my scenario, there is a second application that must >>>> listen to all multicast groups within that same multicast address, >>>> so to simplify configuration I would like to keep the same >>>> multicast address in all machines (I am using a standalone app, not >>>> a jboss cluster). >>>> >>>> thanks >>>> Ricardo >>>> >>>> Ricardo Trindade wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have more than one group (they have different names) with the >>>>> same configuration, so I get the following message a lot in my log : >>>>> 2005-03-21 11:42:11,035 WARN - org.jgroups.protocols.UDP >>>>> discarded message from different group (groupname). Sender was >>>>> testclient3:1086 >>>>> >>>>> I think that given my setup, this is normal. Should I worry >>>>> about this message ? >>>>> >>>>> I saw the following post with the same issue, but there was no >>>>> response : >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/jbo...@li.../msg51082.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Does this justify a WARN ? Am I missing some problem this could >>>>> cause ? >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> Ricardo >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real >>>>> users. >>>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >>>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> javagroups-users mailing list >>>>> jav...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javagroups-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real >>>> users. >>>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >>>> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> javagroups-users mailing list >>>> jav...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javagroups-users >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> javagroups-users mailing list >> jav...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javagroups-users >> > |