Re: [Javacavemaps-developers] Saxon

[Larry G. <jav...@ya...>]

Oh the reason I chose CPL is because I had been talking to a guy who worked for IBM and he told me it was a very open license which allowed the person using our source to virtually do anything with it, including sell it, or build on it and sell that.  I felt it was a less limiting license than LGPL. I'm not totally sure what the differences are however.  I just wanted something that was very close to public domain, except that it would say something to the effect of , "We wrote this and you can't claim that you did."

 Larry Gray
la...@ar...




________________________________
From: Will Lamothe <wil...@gm...>
To: jav...@li...
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:36:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Javacavemaps-developers] Saxon

The project details page lists Other/Proprietary License not CPL. You should update this and distribute the license with the code. I'm surprised developers would commit code without having the license clear.


On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Larry Gray <jav...@ya...> wrote:

i chose CPL

 Larry Gray
la...@ar...




________________________________
From: Will Lamothe <wil...@gm...>
To: jav...@li...
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 5:45:36 PM
Subject: [Javacavemaps-developers] Saxon


There are different versions of Saxon - the one of sourceforge has an open source Mozilla license. Xalan has an open source Apache license. What do you consider "shareware"

You are hosting your project on sourceforge - what is the intended license for this project - the code doesn't seem to contain a license currently.