java-gnome-hackers Mailing List for The java-gnome language bindings project (Page 112)
Brought to you by:
afcowie
Menu
▾
▴
java-gnome-hackers — Hacking on the bindings themselves: design issues and co-ordination
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(102) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(32) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(51) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(22) |
May
|
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(88) |
Feb
(141) |
Mar
(116) |
Apr
(69) |
May
(199) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(212) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(61) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(88) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(33) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(37) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(69) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(30) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(38) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(35) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-01-08 20:49:20
|
Il gio, 2004-01-08 alle 21:05, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto: > I have just compiled the latest garnome (D&DE 2.5.2) and compiled the latest > java-gnome. Everything seems to be working file. > > As you have seen, I am working on the Action/ActionGroup/UIManager classes. Great, I'm glad you've completed the Action constructor;) -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-01-08 20:05:30
|
I have just compiled the latest garnome (D&DE 2.5.2) and compiled the latest java-gnome. Everything seems to be working file. As you have seen, I am working on the Action/ActionGroup/UIManager classes. This is turning out to be somewhat complicated but I finally think I have it under control. I think I have ActionGroup working with the ActionEntry and the ToggleActionEntry classes. All that is remaining is the Radio set of classes. Then I should be able to complete the UIManager class. I hope to complete all of this sometime in the next two days. -Jeff |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ca...> - 2004-01-08 14:24:15
|
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 06:49:18AM -0500, Jeffrey Morgan wrote: > I am currently working on an updated ActionGroup, UIManager, and > numerous associated classes. In the gtk cvs these classes have > undergone some changes. I know it is quite difficult to stay close > to the edge of the gtk/gnome development but I am proposing that > we now move our target to 2.5.2 D&DP. There is a new version of > garnome that now supports this. > > Please let me know what you think. Certainly. I think we should stay to the very latest releases in fact, so 2.5.3 by Jan. 12th (or whenever garnome supports it). Hopefully some tarballs will still be the same so we won't have to get everything again. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-01-08 14:12:00
|
Il gio, 2004-01-08 alle 12:40, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto: > > Just tried latest cvs: it's impossible to load libgtkjava because of > > this error: > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: > > /usr/local/lib/libgtkjava2.3.so.2.3.3: > > /usr/local/lib/libgtkjava2.3.so.2.3.3: undefined symbol: > > gtk_font_button_set_show_style > > > > It's strange because I have this function in gtk and the jni code for > > the FontButton class seems correct. > > It is complaining about not finding the gtk method. This method has > been in gtk since 2.3.1. Please make sure you are using this version > and it is the first in your LD_LIBRARY_PATH. > Silly me! I had LD_LIBRARY_PATH=":/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib" instead I should have LD_LIBRARY_PATH=":/usr/local/lib:/usr/lib" Thanks -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-01-08 11:49:20
|
I am currently working on an updated ActionGroup, UIManager, and numerous associated classes. In the gtk cvs these classes have undergone some changes. I know it is quite difficult to stay close to the edge of the gtk/gnome development but I am proposing that we now move our target to 2.5.2 D&DP. There is a new version of garnome that now supports this. Please let me know what you think. -Jeff |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-01-08 11:40:38
|
> Just tried latest cvs: it's impossible to load libgtkjava because of > this error: > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: > /usr/local/lib/libgtkjava2.3.so.2.3.3: > /usr/local/lib/libgtkjava2.3.so.2.3.3: undefined symbol: > gtk_font_button_set_show_style > > It's strange because I have this function in gtk and the jni code for > the FontButton class seems correct. It is complaining about not finding the gtk method. This method has been in gtk since 2.3.1. Please make sure you are using this version and it is the first in your LD_LIBRARY_PATH. -Jeff |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-01-08 04:15:08
|
Just tried latest cvs: it's impossible to load libgtkjava because of this error: Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /usr/local/lib/libgtkjava2.3.so.2.3.3: /usr/local/lib/libgtkjava2.3.so.2.3.3: undefined symbol: gtk_font_button_set_show_style It's strange because I have this function in gtk and the jni code for the FontButton class seems correct. -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-01-07 12:11:30
|
I will look into this problem. I believe the error you are seeing is because of half-baked code. I should be able to fix it sometime today. -Jeff > Il mar, 2004-01-06 alle 18:56, Mark Howard ha scritto: > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 08:39:48PM +0100, Luca De Rugeriis wrote: > > > I guess we need to set GCONF_LIBS with gconf-config in > aclocal.m4, is it > > > correct? > > > > I think it's better to let autoconf do it for us. I've added > > common/configure.in.gconfdeps and modified configure and makefiles. > Great, I had it working locally too and the same error appears: > > gcc -g -O2 -fPIC -Wall -shared -o ../lib/libgconfjava2.5.so.2.5.3 \ > jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfClient.o jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfEntry.o > jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfMetaInfo.o jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfSchema.o > jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfValue.o \ > -g -O2 -fPIC -Wall -DORBIT2=1 -I/usr/local/include/gconf/2 > -I/usr/local/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0 > -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -pthread -Wl,--export-dynamic > -L/usr/local/lib -lgconf-2 -lORBit-2 -lgobject-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lm > -lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 -I > /home/mari/j2sdk_nb/j2sdk1.4.2/include -I > /home/mari/j2sdk_nb/j2sdk1.4.2/include/linux -Xlinker --no-undefined > jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfClient.o(.text+0x1203): In function > `Java_org_gnu_gconf_ConfClient_gconf_1client_1set_1list': > jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfClient.c:601: undefined reference to `setList' > jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfValue.o(.text+0x116): In function > `Java_org_gnu_gconf_ConfValue_gconf_1value_1get_1list': > jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfValue.c:110: undefined reference to `getList' > jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfValue.o(.text+0x30e): In function > `Java_org_gnu_gconf_ConfValue_gconf_1value_1set_1list': > jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfValue.c:255: undefined reference to `setList' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[2]: *** [../lib/libgconfjava2.5.so.2.5.3] Error 1 > > I have the latest GConf (2.4.0.1) > > -- > Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign > up for IBM's > Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell > to sys admin. > Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click > _______________________________________________ > java-gnome-hackers mailing list > jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-hackers > |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ca...> - 2004-01-07 08:24:26
|
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 11:28:25PM +0100, Luca De Rugeriis wrote: > Il mar, 2004-01-06 alle 18:56, Mark Howard ha scritto: > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 08:39:48PM +0100, Luca De Rugeriis wrote: > > > I guess we need to set GCONF_LIBS with gconf-config in aclocal.m4, is it > > > correct? > > > > I think it's better to let autoconf do it for us. I've added > > common/configure.in.gconfdeps and modified configure and makefiles. > Great, I had it working locally too and the same error appears: did you redo cvs up ./gen* autoconf ./configure ? can you check the output of configure for lines about gconf - should be the last of the long lines -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-01-06 22:29:05
|
Il mar, 2004-01-06 alle 18:56, Mark Howard ha scritto:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 08:39:48PM +0100, Luca De Rugeriis wrote:
> > I guess we need to set GCONF_LIBS with gconf-config in aclocal.m4, is it
> > correct?
>
> I think it's better to let autoconf do it for us. I've added
> common/configure.in.gconfdeps and modified configure and makefiles.
Great, I had it working locally too and the same error appears:
gcc -g -O2 -fPIC -Wall -shared -o ../lib/libgconfjava2.5.so.2.5.3 \
jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfClient.o jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfEntry.o
jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfMetaInfo.o jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfSchema.o
jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfValue.o \
-g -O2 -fPIC -Wall -DORBIT2=1 -I/usr/local/include/gconf/2
-I/usr/local/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0
-I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -pthread -Wl,--export-dynamic
-L/usr/local/lib -lgconf-2 -lORBit-2 -lgobject-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lm
-lgmodule-2.0 -ldl -lglib-2.0 -I
/home/mari/j2sdk_nb/j2sdk1.4.2/include -I
/home/mari/j2sdk_nb/j2sdk1.4.2/include/linux -Xlinker --no-undefined
jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfClient.o(.text+0x1203): In function
`Java_org_gnu_gconf_ConfClient_gconf_1client_1set_1list':
jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfClient.c:601: undefined reference to `setList'
jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfValue.o(.text+0x116): In function
`Java_org_gnu_gconf_ConfValue_gconf_1value_1get_1list':
jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfValue.c:110: undefined reference to `getList'
jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfValue.o(.text+0x30e): In function
`Java_org_gnu_gconf_ConfValue_gconf_1value_1set_1list':
jni/org_gnu_gconf_ConfValue.c:255: undefined reference to `setList'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [../lib/libgconfjava2.5.so.2.5.3] Error 1
I have the latest GConf (2.4.0.1)
--
Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...>
|
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-01-06 21:56:50
|
Il mar, 2004-01-06 alle 22:32, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto: > > > 6) Toolbar enhancements (haven't looked into this.) > > > > I will look into this and clarify. > > ToolBar has significant changes. Half of the class > has been deprecated (replaced by new methods) and a > new object (ToolItem) has been introduced. I just > updated ToolBar and added proper event handling for > this class. I also just created the glue/jni and > the beginning of the public interface for ToolItem. > Somebody needs to complete ToolItem (please!!). > I'll complete it. -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-01-06 21:48:27
|
> Hi, > I'm really busy getting ready for a new term at uni at the moment. > I'm also likely to be busy with my project in the coming weeks, but I > will try to find time for java-gnome. I wouldn't like to commit to > work on one of these new classes at the moment since I'm > really not sure > how much time I have. Please speak up and let us know which new class you wish to implement. >However, I would like to continue > working through > the TODO file implementing changes to existing classes, if that's ok. Sounds good to me. > > 5) Tabular menus (does anybody know what this means?) > I thought they had completely re-written the menus. Perhaps > it's still in > libegg. Anyway, there seem to be a lot of changes looking through the > menu docs, and quite a few deprecations. It would be a good idea to go > through the entire GtkMenu* and gtk*Menu API checking that we > support it > correctly. I hope to look into this today or tomorrow. -Jeff |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-01-06 21:32:56
|
> > 6) Toolbar enhancements (haven't looked into this.) > > I will look into this and clarify. ToolBar has significant changes. Half of the class has been deprecated (replaced by new methods) and a new object (ToolItem) has been introduced. I just updated ToolBar and added proper event handling for this class. I also just created the glue/jni and the beginning of the public interface for ToolItem. Somebody needs to complete ToolItem (please!!). -Jeff |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-01-06 20:26:24
|
> I've noticed the -doc packages aren't available in gnome. Are we not > allowed to have them in gnome? why not? I haven't asked. I will talk to Murray and see what he says. > > If they really don't let us, perhaps we should merge them > into the main > tarballs. I agree. > Also, could we possibly make the all-in-one tarball available on > sourceforge? I understand gnome won't host it, but I think most people > would still prefer to use it. I will try to do this tonight. -Jeff |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ca...> - 2004-01-06 17:56:13
|
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 08:39:48PM +0100, Luca De Rugeriis wrote: > I guess we need to set GCONF_LIBS with gconf-config in aclocal.m4, is it > correct? I think it's better to let autoconf do it for us. I've added common/configure.in.gconfdeps and modified configure and makefiles. This should work, but I can't test at the moment since I don't have a new enough gtk lib to compile the gtk module. configure seems to check for gconf and prints the correct things, so I'm guessing it's ok. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ca...> - 2004-01-06 17:52:27
|
Hi, I've noticed the -doc packages aren't available in gnome. Are we not allowed to have them in gnome? why not? If they really don't let us, perhaps we should merge them into the main tarballs. Also, could we possibly make the all-in-one tarball available on sourceforge? I understand gnome won't host it, but I think most people would still prefer to use it. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ca...> - 2004-01-06 17:52:26
|
Hi, I'm really busy getting ready for a new term at uni at the moment. I'm also likely to be busy with my project in the coming weeks, but I will try to find time for java-gnome. I wouldn't like to commit to work on one of these new classes at the moment since I'm really not sure how much time I have. However, I would like to continue working through the TODO file implementing changes to existing classes, if that's ok. > 5) Tabular menus (does anybody know what this means?) I thought they had completely re-written the menus. Perhaps it's still in libegg. Anyway, there seem to be a lot of changes looking through the menu docs, and quite a few deprecations. It would be a good idea to go through the entire GtkMenu* and gtk*Menu API checking that we support it correctly. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-01-06 16:15:38
|
> Under New Classes: > 1) We need to complete the UIManager, Action, ActionGroup set > of classes. > This is a very critical part of the bindings and should be > completed soon. > 2) We need to add javadocs to ComboBox and ComboBox Entry in order > to complete these classes. > 3) We need to add the public interface for Expander. > 4) We still need to implement FileChooser. Since this item requires JNI work I will get started here. > 5) Tabular menus (does anybody know what this means?) Unless somebody already understands this item I will research and post back with an explanation. > 6) Toolbar enhancements (haven't looked into this.) I will look into this and clarify. -Jeff |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-01-06 14:03:23
|
Yet again I would like to list some of the outstanding items that need attention. As I see it here are a few of the critical items that we should be working on: Under New Classes: 1) We need to complete the UIManager, Action, ActionGroup set of classes. This is a very critical part of the bindings and should be completed soon. 2) We need to add javadocs to ComboBox and ComboBox Entry in order to complete these classes. 3) We need to add the public interface for Expander. 4) We still need to implement FileChooser. 5) Tabular menus (does anybody know what this means?) 6) Toolbar enhancements (haven't looked into this.) It would be nice to have these items completed prior to release 2.5.2 on Jan 19. Who will be able to work on one of these items? -Jeff |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-01-05 23:48:10
|
Il lun, 2004-01-05 alle 22:42, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto: > > The gnome release set hasn't added us to their website yet - > > do you know > > who to contact about this? > > We are now listed on the site: > > http://www.gnome.org/start/2.5/bindings/ > > and > > http://www.gnome.org/start/2.5/bindings/modules.html Good, this will increase java-gnome popularity ;) -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-01-05 23:43:56
|
Il lun, 2004-01-05 alle 23:12, Mark Howard ha scritto: > I think it's only a minor bug so we can wait two weeks. We should > backport this (and any others?) to 0.8 though and release 0.8.3. > > On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:51:40PM -0500, Jeffrey Morgan wrote: > > Is this correct or should it read: > > > > ln -s > > $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so.$(gtkversion) > > $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so > I really should check things more before sending them. > > It should read: > > ln -s libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so.$(gtkversion) $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so > > (This creates a relative link, so the entire directory can be moved if > wanted without messing up the links) > > One other thing I was going to propose: > I think we should add > -rm $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so > before *all* ln lines. > When people install, they expect the new installation to be > automatically made the default. > Any objections to this? It's ok for me, I've always hated when I had to move links from older to newer version. -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ca...> - 2004-01-05 22:13:28
|
I think it's only a minor bug so we can wait two weeks. We should backport this (and any others?) to 0.8 though and release 0.8.3. On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 01:51:40PM -0500, Jeffrey Morgan wrote: > Is this correct or should it read: > > ln -s > $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so.$(gtkversion) > $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so I really should check things more before sending them. It should read: ln -s libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so.$(gtkversion) $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so (This creates a relative link, so the entire directory can be moved if wanted without messing up the links) One other thing I was going to propose: I think we should add -rm $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/libgtkjava$(gtkapiversion).so before *all* ln lines. When people install, they expect the new installation to be automatically made the default. Any objections to this? -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-01-05 21:42:37
|
> The gnome release set hasn't added us to their website yet - > do you know > who to contact about this? We are now listed on the site: http://www.gnome.org/start/2.5/bindings/ and http://www.gnome.org/start/2.5/bindings/modules.html -Jeff |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-01-05 19:40:36
|
Il lun, 2004-01-05 alle 20:29, Luca De Rugeriis ha scritto: > Il lun, 2004-01-05 alle 18:35, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto: > > > I'm a little busy at the moment, but if somebody will check > > > it all into > > > cvs, I will take over maintenance of the news section of the website, > > > update these changes and notify the translators. We need to keep the > > > most up to date info on the site. > > > > > > The gnome release set hasn't added us to their website yet - > > > do you know > > > who to contact about this? > > > > Just made the release. > Great, I'm glad to see so many functions added. > > > The gconf module is still not building > > due to the fact that the GCONF_FLAGS are not being set. > I was just getting into this, do you have any ideas about how it can be > solved? I guess we need to set GCONF_LIBS with gconf-config in aclocal.m4, is it correct? -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-01-05 19:29:58
|
Il lun, 2004-01-05 alle 18:35, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto: > > I'm a little busy at the moment, but if somebody will check > > it all into > > cvs, I will take over maintenance of the news section of the website, > > update these changes and notify the translators. We need to keep the > > most up to date info on the site. > > > > The gnome release set hasn't added us to their website yet - > > do you know > > who to contact about this? > > Just made the release. Great, I'm glad to see so many functions added. > The gconf module is still not building > due to the fact that the GCONF_FLAGS are not being set. I was just getting into this, do you have any ideas about how it can be solved? -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
34 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
