java-gnome-hackers Mailing List for The java-gnome language bindings project (Page 109)
Brought to you by:
afcowie
Menu
▾
▴
java-gnome-hackers — Hacking on the bindings themselves: design issues and co-ordination
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(102) |
Sep
(43) |
Oct
(32) |
Nov
(43) |
Dec
(51) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(22) |
May
|
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(73) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(88) |
Feb
(141) |
Mar
(116) |
Apr
(69) |
May
(199) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(212) |
Nov
(57) |
Dec
(61) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(88) |
Feb
(17) |
Mar
(21) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(44) |
Jun
(33) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(37) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(43) |
Nov
(40) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(69) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(30) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(12) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(30) |
Jul
(39) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(13) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(33) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(25) |
Nov
(9) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(20) |
Feb
(38) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(30) |
Jun
(35) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(23) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(16) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(26) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(14) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(17) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
(8) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-02-06 17:55:13
|
We have a request to provide a gcj only build (does not require a jdk). Has anybody looked into this? -Jeff |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-02-06 16:15:05
|
Just a few items I noticed: The downloads page is stating that 0.8.1 is the latest release. 0.8.2 has been out for a while and I hope to have 0.8.3 out over the weekend. In fact, you might consider adding information about the stable and development downloads and list the required libraries for necessary for each. The Roadmap page is not completely accurate. The bottom section should be removed. The English News page is missing the announcement of release 0.8.1 although it exists in the translations. Also, 0.8.2 was released on December 17. The translations should be updated. Also, I believe there was an Italian translation submitted. -Jeff > Hi, guys i just want to ask for some help with the web site > updates, i will ask day by day for news, roadmaps and how the > project is going, and every 3 days i will post the news i > colect from here, so send me all the info you have :) > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > java-gnome-hackers mailing list > jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-hackers > |
|
From: Rafael G. <rg...@ya...> - 2004-02-06 13:43:41
|
Hi, guys i just want to ask for some help with the web site updates, i will ask day by day for news, roadmaps and how the project is going, and every 3 days i will post the news i colect from here, so send me all the info you have :) |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-02-05 21:42:57
|
Il gio, 2004-02-05 alle 22:27, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto: Hi, first I want to say that you have done an *amazing* work for this release! (especially Jeff). Second, you all know that I was pratically without a decent pc, but things change, and now I can say: *Winnitude*, I got a new pc ;) So I have no excuse now to avoid contributing! For those who like specs: P4 3GHz ht 800MHz fsb 1 GB of ram fx 5600 256MB vga sata 120 GB disk mobo p4p800 Total of 2 processors activated (11979.98 BogoMIPS). That's all ;) (guys, I'm not trolling, it's just something I waited for *years*). -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-02-05 21:33:53
|
> update all examples to latest api (release candidate) Here, I'll really want to add a fudge of j-gnome-demo. (but api comes first!) > update all documentation to latest api (release candidate) -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-02-05 21:27:18
|
I have not asked. -Jeff > Jeff- > Did you ask if we could have doc tarballs in the gnome > release? Or do > we need to merge docs into the other tarballs? > > On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 04:37:47AM -0500, Jeffrey Morgan wrote: > > libgtk-java: > > libgnome-java: > > libgconf-java > > libglade-java > > -- > .''`. Mark Howard > : :' : > `. `' http://www.tildemh.com > `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > java-gnome-hackers mailing list > jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-hackers > |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ca...> - 2004-02-05 19:07:14
|
Jeff- Did you ask if we could have doc tarballs in the gnome release? Or do we need to merge docs into the other tarballs? On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 04:37:47AM -0500, Jeffrey Morgan wrote: > libgtk-java: > libgnome-java: > libgconf-java > libglade-java -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ca...> - 2004-02-05 16:18:47
|
On Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 07:09:13AM -0500, Jeffrey Morgan wrote: > Mark, > > Which changes that you have made to the tree control and associated > classes are backward compatible for the 0.8.3 release? I've only really done the API so far for most of it and some is for gnome 2.4 so I'd suggest just leaving 0.8.3 the same as 0.8.2. I haven't fixed any bugs recently, just added api. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <ku...@zo...> - 2004-02-05 00:02:40
|
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 17:53, Mark Howard wrote: > [Please keep everyone in the To field - java-gnome is far too unreliable > at the moment] > > I was just checking what the current status is. This is my view, please > add anything I've missed: > > API freeze: Feb 16th, possibly +20 days > 2.6.0 release: March 22nd, possibly +xx days > > > re-review tree widgets. I'll do it, but don't know exactly what I'm > doing so some of it might be wrong. Will hopefully mostly work though > - a few new events for treeModel and treeview > - TreeModelFilter (? not sure) > - CellRenderer property handling work > > GtkCellLayout ? - do we need it? > > CellEditable - new class, not started > - editing-done signal > > Clipboard - many methods Not started > > Many classes with small number of new methods (see todo.gtk) Yes. > > Implementation of many tree methods (I've just been designing the api so > far). grep -i -r todo * > > (copied from old list - are these mostly done now?) > complete/debug *Action* and UIManager classes (2.5.3) Still needs a little debugging > implement the new FileChooser class (2.5.4) Done > update the Menu* classes to reflect the latest gtk (2.5.4) Done > update of gnome and gnomeui classes to current (beta1) Not started - only a few items listed in todo.gnome > update all remaining gtk classes to current (2.5.4 through beta1) Remaining items are in todo.gtk > fix remaining gconf issues (2.5.4) Not started > update all examples to latest api (release candidate) > update all documentation to latest api (release candidate) > |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ca...> - 2004-02-04 22:53:40
|
[Please keep everyone in the To field - java-gnome is far too unreliable at the moment] I was just checking what the current status is. This is my view, please add anything I've missed: API freeze: Feb 16th, possibly +20 days 2.6.0 release: March 22nd, possibly +xx days re-review tree widgets. I'll do it, but don't know exactly what I'm doing so some of it might be wrong. Will hopefully mostly work though - a few new events for treeModel and treeview - TreeModelFilter (? not sure) - CellRenderer property handling work GtkCellLayout ? - do we need it? CellEditable - new class, not started - editing-done signal Clipboard - many methods Many classes with small number of new methods (see todo.gtk) Implementation of many tree methods (I've just been designing the api so far). grep -i -r todo * (copied from old list - are these mostly done now?) complete/debug *Action* and UIManager classes (2.5.3) implement the new FileChooser class (2.5.4) update the Menu* classes to reflect the latest gtk (2.5.4) update of gnome and gnomeui classes to current (beta1) update all remaining gtk classes to current (2.5.4 through beta1) fix remaining gconf issues (2.5.4) update all examples to latest api (release candidate) update all documentation to latest api (release candidate) -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-02-04 16:21:29
|
Il mer, 2004-02-04 alle 14:27, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto: > > Il mer, 2004-02-04 alle 02:43, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto: > > > I cannot express how angry I am with sourceforge. Their email > > > is unreliable, their cvs is unreliable, and now I have been > > > trying for over one hour to upload our new release. Their > > > ftp server allows me to connect but refuses to upload even > > > one byte. Hopefully I will get this release completed tonight!! > > This is really bad :( > > I'm seeing some messages I've sended yesterday come in this moment! > > How is the situation with our hosting on gnome? > > I think we will have no problem doing this but now is not > a good time. We need to wait until do not have such tight > deadlines. Moving the cvs, etc. will cause disruption. I > was thinking we could try to move after 2.6 is released. Ok, I understand it. -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-02-04 16:21:07
|
Il mer, 2004-02-04 alle 06:22, Vikram Hardi ha scritto: > Luca, what more needs to be added to this to bring it to life. > You mentioned few ideas in your last email, can you elaborate on any? ? I'm afraid I haven't understood :( I was thinking of opening a new SF project with us as mantainers, and upload the cromagnon's sources to the public. However tommorrow I'm going to get new hardware so I'll just wait few days until I'm setted up, then we can work on it. I was thinking to add few more changes then release a 0.2 (stable) tarball, start a SF project, create a cvs repo, create a m-list, create a quick and simple website. Then we could release a (stable) 0.2 release, and in the meanwhile work on a devel 0.3 version where we use the latest java-gnome code (that is use the FileChooser for example, and the new toolbar/menu system), which eventually will be released as stable 0.4 together with j-g 2.6/gnome-2.6. Let me know what you think. -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-02-04 13:27:13
|
> Il mer, 2004-02-04 alle 02:43, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto: > > I cannot express how angry I am with sourceforge. Their email > > is unreliable, their cvs is unreliable, and now I have been > > trying for over one hour to upload our new release. Their > > ftp server allows me to connect but refuses to upload even > > one byte. Hopefully I will get this release completed tonight!! > This is really bad :( > I'm seeing some messages I've sended yesterday come in this moment! > How is the situation with our hosting on gnome? I think we will have no problem doing this but now is not a good time. We need to wait until do not have such tight deadlines. Moving the cvs, etc. will cause disruption. I was thinking we could try to move after 2.6 is released. -Jeff |
|
From: Vikram H. <Vik...@Br...> - 2004-02-04 05:22:20
|
Luca, what more needs to be added to this to bring it to life. You mentioned few ideas in your last email, can you elaborate on any? Vikram -----Original Message----- From: Luca De Rugeriis [mailto:pie...@li...] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2004 4:56 PM To: java-gnome-hackers Subject: Re: [java-gnome-hackers] CroMagnon Il mar, 2004-02-03 alle 00:56, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto: > I agree. Attached is what I believe to be the latest code. > Luca, can you please verify. Thanks a lot Jeff it's the right one. Vikram, take a look at the code and let me know if you want to give life to this new project ;) -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ java-gnome-hackers mailing list jav...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-hackers |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-02-04 03:02:41
|
Il mer, 2004-02-04 alle 02:43, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto: > I cannot express how angry I am with sourceforge. Their email > is unreliable, their cvs is unreliable, and now I have been > trying for over one hour to upload our new release. Their > ftp server allows me to connect but refuses to upload even > one byte. Hopefully I will get this release completed tonight!! This is really bad :( I'm seeing some messages I've sended yesterday come in this moment! How is the situation with our hosting on gnome? -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <ku...@zo...> - 2004-02-04 01:56:58
|
I cannot express how angry I am with sourceforge. Their email is unreliable, their cvs is unreliable, and now I have been trying for over one hour to upload our new release. Their ftp server allows me to connect but refuses to upload even one byte. Hopefully I will get this release completed tonight!! -Jeff On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 19:04, Jeffrey Morgan wrote: > I guess I need to make the next release this evening. Please > commit any code you have completed so it will be part of the > build. > > -Jeff |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <ku...@zo...> - 2004-02-04 00:17:31
|
I guess I need to make the next release this evening. Please commit any code you have completed so it will be part of the build. -Jeff |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-02-03 21:59:58
|
Il mar, 2004-02-03 alle 00:56, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto: > I agree. Attached is what I believe to be the latest code. > Luca, can you please verify. Thanks a lot Jeff it's the right one. Vikram, take a look at the code and let me know if you want to give life to thi new project ;) -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-02-03 21:53:28
|
Il mar, 2004-02-03 alle 00:56, Jeffrey Morgan ha scritto: > I agree. Attached is what I believe to be the latest code. > Luca, can you please verify. Thanks a lot Jeff it's the right one. Vikram, take a look at the code and let me know if you want to give life to this new project ;) -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ca...> - 2004-02-03 14:07:51
|
Hi, If nobody disagrees, I would like to senf this to -developer and hopefully Jeff will also consider adding it as a job request on sourceforge. Hello, The Java-Gnome project produces a set of bindings of the core Gnome developer platform for the Java language. We have recently joined the official Gnome Bindings Release and as part of this have made a large overhaul of our repository structure and build system. We have a working build system but none of us are experts or even experienced in the GNU autoconf/make tools so there are a few areas where we could do with help. Our current build process: From our repository, we release an all-in-one tarball, plus several separate tarballs (one for each module). Each tarball has it's own configure script and make files. Since these have many sections in common, we generate the actual Makefile.in and configure.in files from shared files and *.in.in files using a very simple perl script. The makefiles themselves then compile java-gnome, which involves compiling java source files to java bytecode and native code (with gcj), compiling c source files (jni files) and also packaging everything into a jar file and shared libraries. This part of the build process works well. What we want help with: (in decreasing order of priority) Modifying the configure script so that any java compiler can be used. At the moment, we default to javac and allow kaffe with a configure time option. GNU autoconf-archive has a macro which is supposed to do this, but unfortunately I couldn't get it to work (it wasn't setting the JAVA_CFLAGS variable). Instead, we're using a macro which is very inflexible and looks like it is a hack of a hack. For the separate module tarballs, e.g. libgnome-java, we need to locate libraries which would have been produced by the other tarballs, such as libgtk2.5-java.so. At the moment, these are hand coded to the default installation locations. It would be good if this could be configurable. It would be helpful if we had more parts of the process configurable. For example, if we could say configure --nodocs so that documentation does not get generated. In general, having somebody who knows what they're doing look over our build system and suggesting any improvements which could be made would be very reassuring If you have experience with the standard GNU tools, we really would like to hear from you. Any help you may offer would be very much appreciated. A little knowledge of java would be helpful but is in no way necessary. We will be able to give lots of help if you need it. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <Jef...@Br...> - 2004-02-03 12:09:22
|
Mark, Which changes that you have made to the tree control and associated classes are backward compatible for the 0.8.3 release? -Jeff |
|
From: Jeffrey M. <ku...@zo...> - 2004-02-03 04:17:18
|
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 18:48, Luca De Rugeriis wrote: > Il lun, 2004-02-02 alle 23:44, Vikram Hardi ha scritto: > > Hello, > > > > I am interested in contributing to this project, hopefully I can begin > > looking into some example programs (developed using java-gnome) and turn > > them into fully functional utility programs associated with this project. > > Based on few emails I read, Mark Howard mentioned about moving "CroMagnon" > > onto sourceforge. I was wondering if someone can provide more information on > > the current status and the latest source. > Hi, > I was the last who touched CroMagnon, I would like to find a proper > place for it on SF too. Unfortunately I haven't the latest sources at > hand, so I can't send tem to you, but I'll get them. Mark, perhaps you > could send them to him? > If not I'll send them in few days. > > Cromagnon could become a nice app even more when java-gnome will support > notification-area/gnome-panel. > Last time I've upgraded it, it was quite functional (it can create new > crontab entries and save them as well as modify existing ones). > > Is it fine to you if we manage to create a new project for it together? > Is everyone agree? I agree. Attached is what I believe to be the latest code. Luca, can you please verify. -Jeff |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@li...> - 2004-02-02 23:45:57
|
Il lun, 2004-02-02 alle 23:44, Vikram Hardi ha scritto: > Hello, > > I am interested in contributing to this project, hopefully I can begin > looking into some example programs (developed using java-gnome) and turn > them into fully functional utility programs associated with this project. > Based on few emails I read, Mark Howard mentioned about moving "CroMagnon" > onto sourceforge. I was wondering if someone can provide more information on > the current status and the latest source. Hi, I was the last who touched CroMagnon, I would like to find a proper place for it on SF too. Unfortunately I haven't the latest sources at hand, so I can't send tem to you, but I'll get them. Mark, perhaps you could send them to him? If not I'll send them in few days. Cromagnon could become a nice app even more when java-gnome will support notification-area/gnome-panel. Last time I've upgraded it, it was quite functional (it can create new crontab entries and save them as well as modify existing ones). Is it fine to you if we manage to create a new project for it together? Is everyone agree? -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@li...> |
|
From: Vikram H. <Vik...@Br...> - 2004-02-02 22:44:40
|
Hello,
I am interested in contributing to this project, hopefully I can begin
looking into some example programs (developed using java-gnome) and turn
them into fully functional utility programs associated with this project.
Based on few emails I read, Mark Howard mentioned about moving "CroMagnon"
onto sourceforge. I was wondering if someone can provide more information on
the current status and the latest source. Or any other utility programs (or
ideas) that can be developed using Java-gnome api which in turn can add
value to the Java-Gnome project.
Thanks,
-Vikram
|
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ca...> - 2004-02-02 20:45:18
|
One issue I know of (affect HEAD too) install target is failing for the docs. I'm not sure how best to fix this. To test: ./configure --prefix=/foo/bar/tmp make install This will install everything in /foo/bar/tmp please test installation before releasing the tarballs. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... | mh...@ca... |
34 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
