java-gnome-developer Mailing List for The java-gnome language bindings project (Page 66)
Brought to you by:
afcowie
Menu
▾
▴
java-gnome-developer — For people using the bindings to write their own applications
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(37) |
Dec
(14) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2001 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(20) |
Apr
(8) |
May
|
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(39) |
Sep
(37) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(50) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2002 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(32) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(11) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(35) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(91) |
Nov
(185) |
Dec
(207) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(108) |
Feb
(171) |
Mar
(207) |
Apr
(113) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(53) |
Jul
(69) |
Aug
(43) |
Sep
(34) |
Oct
(182) |
Nov
(101) |
Dec
(61) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(86) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(106) |
Apr
(67) |
May
(70) |
Jun
(47) |
Jul
(19) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(24) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(20) |
Dec
(58) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(21) |
Feb
(21) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(24) |
Jun
(47) |
Jul
(20) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(23) |
Dec
(2) |
| 2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
(14) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(15) |
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(13) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(30) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(9) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(7) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(27) |
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(4) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(15) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(11) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(11) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(8) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
(10) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(6) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
|
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(2) |
May
(3) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2020 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ti...> - 2004-10-14 12:00:24
|
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 02:21:43PM -0300, Joao Victor wrote: > Is it possible to use JavaGnome with Groovy (http://groovy.codehaus.org/)? Looking at the website, there should be no problem running java-gnome with it. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... |
|
From: Skip C. <sco...@gm...> - 2004-10-14 00:42:57
|
Rishabh,
I have also been going through the tutorial and have come against the
same problem you have with the event listener . How did you resolve
it ?
scoon
On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 13:10:36 -0500, Rishabh Manocha <rma...@gm...> wrote:
> Thanks for writing back, but i have managed to slove this problem. My
> problem now is the About window not accepting any click events.
> I will reply to the e-mail you sent.
> Thanks
> --Rishabh
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:47:24 +0100, Mark Howard <mh...@ti...> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry for taking so long to reply. Do you have a call to showAll() in your code?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 05:29:21PM -0500, Rishabh Manocha wrote:
> > >
> > > public void createMenu() {
> > > MenuBar bar = new MenuBar();
> > > MenuItem child = new MenuItem("File",false);
> > > Menu file = new Menu();
> > > MenuItem quit = new MenuItem("Quit",false);
> > > quit.addListener(new ItemListener() {
> > > public void itemEvent(ItemEvent event) {
> > > fileExit();
> > > }
> > > });
> > > file.append(quit);
> > > child.setSubmenu(file);
> > > bar.append(child);
> > > this.app.setMenuBar(bar);
> > > }
> > >
> > > However this does not show a menubar at all. I feel I am so close but
> > > yet so far.
> >
> > --
> > .''`. Mark Howard
> > : :' :
> > `. `' http://www.tildemh.com
> > `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti...
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
> Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
> Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
> _______________________________________________
> java-gnome-developer mailing list
> jav...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/java-gnome-developer
>
|
|
From: Jerry H. <jh...@fe...> - 2004-10-13 20:17:45
|
So what is up with the build system? I am going through the autoconf stuff and the macro directories. What are the plans for it? Right now my problem is that the macros are screwing up detection of the C preprocessor. It's trying to use /lib/cpp, which does not exist when building with MinGW. Removing the custom macros totally makes the C preprocessor detection work fine, but of course removes the possibility of the rest of it working. ;) If nobody is working on the build system full time, I'd be willing to give it a crack. I would like to centralize the common m4 macros out of each lib*-java directory. |
|
From: Jerry H. <jh...@fe...> - 2004-10-13 18:02:01
|
Success! I have Java-Gnome running on Windows. It wasn't that hard. The
hardest part was understanding MinGW. There is nothing special that
needs to be done to compilation itself, other than to know how to use
MinGW properly. The build scripts do not work. But, since they are
autoconfed, making them work shouldn't be too hard.
Right now I am confronted with one big issue. Windows supports Glade. It
doesn't however support the Gnome additional controls (I'm sure it
could, but nobody has ported them). However, Java-Gnome's Glade bindings
do not appear to be usable without a port of org.gnu.gnome. Here is what
I get while trying to auto connect a Glade file created as a GTK+
project (no Gnome widgets used):
There is no AppBar in my project:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org.gnu.gnome.event.A
ppBarListener
at org.gnu.glade.ListenerDelegate.class$(ListenerDelegate.java)
at
org.gnu.glade.ListenerDelegate.<clinit>(ListenerDelegate.java:196)
at org.gnu.glade.LibGlade.connect(LibGlade.java:172)
at
org.gnu.glade.LibGlade.glade_xml_signal_autoconnect_full(Native Metho
d)
at org.gnu.glade.LibGlade.<init>(LibGlade.java:118)
at
com.feedbackplusinc.fast.ui.glade.GladeLoader.load(GladeLoader.java:3
4)
at
com.feedbackplusinc.fast.ui.windows.GladeWindow.createWindow(GladeWin
dow.java:52)
at
com.feedbackplusinc.fast.ui.windows.BaseWindow.init(BaseWindow.java:3
7)
at
com.feedbackplusinc.fast.ui.windows.BaseWindow.populate(BaseWindow.ja
va:72)
at
com.feedbackplusinc.fast.ui.gnome.GladeTest.main(GladeTest.java:42)
|
|
From: Joao V. <jvi...@ya...> - 2004-10-13 17:21:53
|
Is it possible to use JavaGnome with Groovy (http://groovy.codehaus.org/)? Thanks, J.V. _______________________________________________________ Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora! http://br.acesso.yahoo.com/ |
|
From: Andrew C. <an...@op...> - 2004-10-13 16:58:16
|
Hey, So I've been rewriting my little geode [1] archive-to-usbkey script in java-gnome, largely as an exercise in doing something actually useful before I proceed with [risking] using java-gnome in a bigger project. Mostly, this isn't a GUI event driven thing - it's just a bog standard program that happens to want to display its progress in a nice GUI window. That, however, means a worker thread, and then trying to cause things to happen in the GUI instance. My question is this: have I done this code right? I'm asking now, before I get too much further down the track. I've done all the bits of this individually in the past (duh), but I'm worried that in combining them I've made some fatal assumption to do with GTK, or how java-gnome wraps it, or.... It does seem to work fine, although I had to play around quite a bit before I got the the worker thread and the [implicit] main thread to co-operate nicely together. Mark pointed out to me that I needed to use "CustomEvents" to fire any the Gtk.main loop. I'm *not* doing that and everything seems to work (although I did fire a CustomEvent to ensure that the main loop had a chance to run). So is this horrible code, or will it do as a skeleton to proceed from? I'm not talking about things like "oh there's a package class in your file that should be in a separate file" but rather whether or not I've gone about things the right way. [It's my hope that this is good enough that it can eventually become a good quality, "easy to understand" reference example for people new to java-gnome to look at after the examples] I've attached the main .java file if you want to have a peek. If you're actually inclined to want to build it (cool!), you can get it by: tla register-archive http://research.operationaldynamics.com/arch/hacks/ tla get an...@op...--hacks/geode--trunk--0.3 geode cd geode And then either make java to compile the classes and run it in a standard JVM, or make native to build it with GCJ and run the resultant executable. You'll have to change the Makefile as it assumes your bleeding edge gnome libraries are in /opt/gnome2 . [No, there's no configure or any of that nonsense yet]. [For those struggling with getting gcj to work right, the native section of the Makefile may be of interest to you - I've been using GCJ quite successfully with java-gnome for some time now] As I said, it's just a skeleton at this point. It works (!), but I really would welcome any suggestions, help, abuse, or advice before I slog on further. Thanks! AfC Sydney [1] Presently, geode is a bash scrip from hell, but if nothing else it's a good practical application of zenity. I use it every day. See http://www.operationaldynamics.com/reference/software/scripts/#geode -- Andrew Frederick Cowie OPERATIONAL DYNAMICS Operations Consultants and Infrastructure Engineers http://www.operationaldynamics.com/ |
|
From: Andrew C. <an...@op...> - 2004-10-13 16:24:29
|
On Wed, 2004-13-10 at 16:29 +0100, Mark Howard wrote: > We really must write a HintsAndTips page about gcj native compilation. I'= ve > never really used it though - can somebody more experienced with it pleas= e have > a go at writing the page please. I'm pretty close to being at that point - I'll write a GCJ section in a few days. See my next email it will indirectly have a lot of GCJ material in it. AfC Sydney |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ti...> - 2004-10-13 15:29:45
|
> Hope I was clear, please correct me if I'm wrong :) Absolutely right. If you're not interested in native gcj compilation (the jar.so file), you can disable building and installing it with a flag to ./configure. Off the top of my head, this is --without-gcj-compile, but please check rather than taking my word for it. We really must write a HintsAndTips page about gcj native compilation. I've never really used it though - can somebody more experienced with it please have a go at writing the page please. -- .""`. Mark Howard : :" : `. `" http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@fa...> - 2004-10-13 15:00:18
|
Il giorno mer, 13-10-2004 alle 09:27 -0500, Jerry Haltom ha scritto: > What are the differences between the two .so files installed with > Java-Gnome? libgtkjava2.4.so libgtkjar2.4.so? The former is our C library used by jni, you need it in your LD_LIBRAY_PATH for the java interpreter (or gcj compiler) to find it. The latter is the native gcj compiled java code which makes our alternative ABI (same API), it is used by gcj _compiler_ to compile your java classes as native code (i.e. shared libraries or ELF executables), so you can have a native unix executable without using any interpreter. Hope I was clear, please correct me if I'm wrong :) -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@fa...> |
|
From: Jerry H. <wa...@la...> - 2004-10-13 14:29:45
|
What are the differences between the two .so files installed with Java-Gnome? libgtkjava2.4.so libgtkjar2.4.so? |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ti...> - 2004-10-13 12:42:30
|
Quoting bbskill <bb...@to...>: > I downloaded java-gnome-2.7.2,and ./configure > then when I executed make,the error appeared as follows: > > jni/org_gnu_gnome_IconList.o(.text+0x56b): In function > `Java_org_gnu_gnome_IconL ist_gnome_1icon_1list_1select_1all': > jni/org_gnu_gnome_IconList.c:278: undefined reference to > `gnome_icon_list_select _all' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > make[2]: *** [../lib/libgnomejava2.7.so.2.7.2] ´íÎó 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/incoming/java-gnome-2.7.2/gnome/src' > make[1]: *** [distro] ´íÎó 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/incoming/java-gnome-2.7.2/gnome' > make: *** [all] ´íÎó 1 > > what is the problem ? Looks like you're using a version of gnome (libgnome or libgnomeui) which is too old, so doesn't have that function. > another problem: > I have tried |aptitude |install |libjava-gnome-doc libgtk0-java > libgnome0-java libglade0-java in debian > And I could not find the gtk.jar and gnome.jar in my debian ?? > How can I fix it? The lib*0-java packages are dummy packages - the description of them in aptitude should say this (I've just updated this on the java-gnome website too, thanks for reminding me). You need the lib*2-java packages instead. These contain the newer jar files. You will then have to add these to your classpath and set ld_library_path See the following page for more details: http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/bin/view/Main/SettingLDLibPath Please write back if you have any more problems -- .""`. Mark Howard : :" : `. `" http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... |
|
From: Andrew C. <an...@op...> - 2004-10-13 12:35:13
|
On Wed, 2004-13-10 at 19:38 +0800, bbskill wrote: > I downloaded java-gnome-2.7.2,and ./configure > then when I executed make,the error appeared as follows: Attached is what *I* use to build java-gnome once I have it from CVS. This isn't official or anything, but it does the trick for me. cd ~/cvs/gnome2/java-gnome cvs update -PAd ./Build [A top level Makefile recently appeared which does almost the same thing] I've been using jhbuild to get an alternate installation of gnome on my system, and then manually update & build java-gnome with this ./Build script. Real Soon Now (tm) I'll switch to using garnome (just as soon as I get java-gnome INTO garnome. This weekend's project) Hope that helps. AfC Sydney |
|
From: bbskill <bb...@to...> - 2004-10-13 11:36:50
|
I downloaded java-gnome-2.7.2,and ./configure
then when I executed make,the error appeared as follows:
jni/org_gnu_gnome_IconList.o(.text+0x56b): In function
`Java_org_gnu_gnome_IconL ist_gnome_1icon_1list_1select_1all':
jni/org_gnu_gnome_IconList.c:278: undefined reference to
`gnome_icon_list_select _all'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[2]: *** [../lib/libgnomejava2.7.so.2.7.2] =B4=ED=CE=F3 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/mnt/incoming/java-gnome-2.7.2/gnome/src'
make[1]: *** [distro] =B4=ED=CE=F3 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/incoming/java-gnome-2.7.2/gnome'
make: *** [all] =B4=ED=CE=F3 1
what is the problem ?
another problem:
I have tried |aptitude |install |libjava-gnome-doc libgtk0-java
libgnome0-java libglade0-java in debian
but when I javac the |*First.java in GNOME-tutorial, it says :
First.java:2: package org.gnu.gnome does not exist
import org.gnu.gnome.App;
^
First.java:3: package org.gnu.gnome does not exist
import org.gnu.gnome.Program;
^
First.java:4: package org.gnu.gtk does not exist
import org.gnu.gtk.Gtk;
^
First.java:10: cannot resolve symbol
symbol : variable Program
location: class First
Program.initGnomeUI("First", "0.1", args);
^
First.java:12: cannot resolve symbol
symbol : class App
location: class First
App app =3D new App("First", "First App");
^
First.java:12: cannot resolve symbol
symbol : class App
location: class First
App app =3D new App("First", "First App");
^
First.java:15: cannot resolve symbol
symbol : variable Gtk
location: class First
Gtk.main();
^
7 errors
And I could not find the gtk.jar and gnome.jar in my debian ??
How can I fix it?
Thank you !!
*
|
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ti...> - 2004-10-13 08:17:20
|
The 2.7.4 tarballs don't have an overall build script -- you have to go into each module directory (starting at libgtk-java) and run ./autogen, make and make install. CVS has an overall build script (which just builds the separate modules in the manner mentioned above), which will be in the next release. The maketarballs is an old helper script, originally for making releases. It needs updating at some point. Quoting bbskill <bb...@to...>: > I have downloaded the java-gnome-2.7.4.tar.bz2,unpack it, > There aren't README and INSTALL files,just a maketarballs.sh > so run ./maketarballs.sh,and then here is the result: > > You MUST run this script from a directory where a clean cvs checkout of > java-gnome can be found in tmp/java-gnome. > > what is the meaning? what should I do ? -- .""`. Mark Howard : :" : `. `" http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... |
|
From: bbskill <bb...@to...> - 2004-10-13 05:13:25
|
I have downloaded the java-gnome-2.7.4.tar.bz2,unpack it, There aren't README and INSTALL files,just a maketarballs.sh so run ./maketarballs.sh,and then here is the result: You MUST run this script from a directory where a clean cvs checkout of java-gnome can be found in tmp/java-gnome. what is the meaning? what should I do ? |
|
From: Joao V. <jvi...@ya...> - 2004-10-12 21:10:21
|
Yes. In a few words, being multiplatform like Swing has a cost (slow, ugly, not integrated with the running enviroment, etc). If you don't want to pay that cost, if you want better integration with the Linux enviroment, then you may go with Java-Gnome. J.V. --- eClaire <ecl...@la...> escreveu: > > Thanks for answers. I did't understand everything. So, for you, if you > have to develop a linux software, you will use java-gnome because there > is a good plateform for developpers (eclipse, gcj, java-gnome and > glade). Java-gnome is faster because there isn't a abstract level > between the system and java-gnome like system and swing. am I true? > > Claire _______________________________________________________ Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora! http://br.acesso.yahoo.com/ |
|
From: eClaire <ecl...@la...> - 2004-10-12 20:45:18
|
Thanks for answers. I did't understand everything. So, for you, if you have to develop a linux software, you will use java-gnome because there is a good plateform for developpers (eclipse, gcj, java-gnome and glade). Java-gnome is faster because there isn't a abstract level between the system and java-gnome like system and swing. am I true? Claire |
|
From: Luca De R. <pie...@fa...> - 2004-10-12 20:11:04
|
Il giorno mar, 12-10-2004 alle 14:46 -0500, Rishabh Manocha ha scritto: > Sorry for that, I was looking at the SF CVS repository when I said > there was no recent change to the makefile. apparently the gnome cvs > repository has recent commits. but still, make is the too being used > so I will look into writing a ant buildfile for java-gnome(if it is > possible). > --Rishabh We used ant in the past but now it's dropped. You can't find a recent makefile, cause the makefile is generated with autoconf, so in cvs you'll find Makefile.in only, then you can generate it with an autogen.sh script. J-g uses autoconf atm, but no automake, libtool, etc. -- Luca De Rugeriis <pie...@fa...> |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ti...> - 2004-10-12 20:09:24
|
What's wrong with Make? When I was looking at it, it seems far more suitable than ant, especially for the jni part and finding the native libraries On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 02:46:06PM -0500, Rishabh Manocha wrote: > Sorry for that, I was looking at the SF CVS repository when I said > there was no recent change to the makefile. apparently the gnome cvs > repository has recent commits. but still, make is the too being used > so I will look into writing a ant buildfile for java-gnome(if it is > possible). > --Rishabh -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ti...> - 2004-10-12 20:08:03
|
Our latest cvs is at cvs.gnome.org, you're probably looking at the old code in sourceforge. On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 02:41:49PM -0500, Rishabh Manocha wrote: > wha build system does java-gnome use?? the traditional make or ANT?? > I couldnt find a recently uploaded makefile in the CVS and since there > has been so much talk of improving the build method, I was thinking > maybe that is not what is used to do the work. > just wondering. > If Ant is not used, I can look into making a build file for it. > --Rishabh > > > On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 20:30:54 +0100, Mark Howard <mh...@ti...> wrote: > > > > This is great news. Please keep us informed of your progress. > > If possible, could you keep a log of what you try, even if just to say it > > doesn't work. Do this on the wiki: > > http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/bin/view/Main/WindowsCompilation > > > > We would certainly welcome improvements to the build system. There is a lot to > > be done on it. Please make sure you are using the latest cvs code though -- we > > have been trying to improve it. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 12:25:09PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: > > > Yes, you heard it. I'm giving it a shot. I don't think it should be too > > > hard, all of Gtk at least is available. The build system does suck. I > > > have a few ideas for that now after having looked at it. > > > > > > Has anybody given this a shot yet? It doesn't seem that hard to me. The > > > JNI files will be compiled against the GTK distribution that Gimp gives > > > out, should work fine. Obvious pieces like Gconf aren't going to work. > > > > > > I'm looking for advice. :0 > > > > > > -- > > .''`. Mark Howard > > : :' : > > `. `' http://www.tildemh.com > > `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... > > > > > > > > -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... |
|
From: Rishabh M. <rma...@gm...> - 2004-10-12 19:46:12
|
Sorry for that, I was looking at the SF CVS repository when I said there was no recent change to the makefile. apparently the gnome cvs repository has recent commits. but still, make is the too being used so I will look into writing a ant buildfile for java-gnome(if it is possible). --Rishabh On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:41:49 -0500, Rishabh Manocha <rma...@gm...> wrote: > wha build system does java-gnome use?? the traditional make or ANT?? > I couldnt find a recently uploaded makefile in the CVS and since there > has been so much talk of improving the build method, I was thinking > maybe that is not what is used to do the work. > just wondering. > If Ant is not used, I can look into making a build file for it. > --Rishabh > > > > > On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 20:30:54 +0100, Mark Howard <mh...@ti...> wrote: > > > > This is great news. Please keep us informed of your progress. > > If possible, could you keep a log of what you try, even if just to say it > > doesn't work. Do this on the wiki: > > http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/bin/view/Main/WindowsCompilation > > > > We would certainly welcome improvements to the build system. There is a lot to > > be done on it. Please make sure you are using the latest cvs code though -- we > > have been trying to improve it. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 12:25:09PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: > > > Yes, you heard it. I'm giving it a shot. I don't think it should be too > > > hard, all of Gtk at least is available. The build system does suck. I > > > have a few ideas for that now after having looked at it. > > > > > > Has anybody given this a shot yet? It doesn't seem that hard to me. The > > > JNI files will be compiled against the GTK distribution that Gimp gives > > > out, should work fine. Obvious pieces like Gconf aren't going to work. > > > > > > I'm looking for advice. :0 > > > > > > -- > > .''`. Mark Howard > > : :' : > > `. `' http://www.tildemh.com > > `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... > > > > > > > |
|
From: Rishabh M. <rma...@gm...> - 2004-10-12 19:41:51
|
wha build system does java-gnome use?? the traditional make or ANT?? I couldnt find a recently uploaded makefile in the CVS and since there has been so much talk of improving the build method, I was thinking maybe that is not what is used to do the work. just wondering. If Ant is not used, I can look into making a build file for it. --Rishabh On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 20:30:54 +0100, Mark Howard <mh...@ti...> wrote: > > This is great news. Please keep us informed of your progress. > If possible, could you keep a log of what you try, even if just to say it > doesn't work. Do this on the wiki: > http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/bin/view/Main/WindowsCompilation > > We would certainly welcome improvements to the build system. There is a lot to > be done on it. Please make sure you are using the latest cvs code though -- we > have been trying to improve it. > > > > > On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 12:25:09PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: > > Yes, you heard it. I'm giving it a shot. I don't think it should be too > > hard, all of Gtk at least is available. The build system does suck. I > > have a few ideas for that now after having looked at it. > > > > Has anybody given this a shot yet? It doesn't seem that hard to me. The > > JNI files will be compiled against the GTK distribution that Gimp gives > > out, should work fine. Obvious pieces like Gconf aren't going to work. > > > > I'm looking for advice. :0 > > > -- > .''`. Mark Howard > : :' : > `. `' http://www.tildemh.com > `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... > > > |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ti...> - 2004-10-12 19:31:13
|
This is great news. Please keep us informed of your progress.=20 If possible, could you keep a log of what you try, even if just to say it doesn't work. Do this on the wiki: http://java-gnome.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/bin/view/Main/WindowsCompilation We would certainly welcome improvements to the build system. There is a lot= to be done on it. Please make sure you are using the latest cvs code though --= we have been trying to improve it. On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 12:25:09PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote: > Yes, you heard it. I'm giving it a shot. I don't think it should be too > hard, all of Gtk at least is available. The build system does suck. I > have a few ideas for that now after having looked at it. >=20 > Has anybody given this a shot yet? It doesn't seem that hard to me. The > JNI files will be compiled against the GTK distribution that Gimp gives > out, should work fine. Obvious pieces like Gconf aren't going to work. >=20 > I'm looking for advice. :0 --=20 .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com=20 `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti...=20 |
|
From: Mark H. <mh...@ti...> - 2004-10-12 19:25:26
|
Hi, On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 06:12:30PM +0100, Sean Coughlan wrote: > I appreciate your renewed effort with regards to correspondance on the > java-gnome mailing list, i'm working a on and off on a few other > java-gnome projects right now... most concentrating on time saving > frameworks around java-gnome. That sounds excellent. > > I work in an XP team, and we unit test and acceptance test all our > apps, i've being working on an acceptance test framework for > java-gnome and look forward to telling ye guys about it when its > ready. i believe it'd be the first acceptance test framework for > gnome? Sounds about right. I guess we really did need to switch to bugzilla then - no doubt you'll uncover a large number of issues. > I've also been working on an xmlGuiBuilder which ties into my HMVC > framework for java-gnome for event firing and event listening, and it > will allow for quite a nice seperation of domain and gui in my humble > opinion. I'm curious. What does this actually do? It sounds just like glade at the moment. > Again thanks for all your hard work, and i will add jbalor to the list > of apps on the website. That's great, thanks. -- .''`. Mark Howard : :' : `. `' http://www.tildemh.com `- mh...@de... | mh...@ti... |
|
From: Rodrigo C. <rc...@gm...> - 2004-10-12 17:43:50
|
Hi! I saw this page the other day (haven't tried it though, I am lacking a windows machine : ): http://cygnome2.sourceforge.net/ If I am not mistaken it is a cygwin port of gnome to use the X server built for it too. You could try this out, it should be smooth to build on cygwin (is there a gcj port to cygwin?). Rodrigo Couto On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 12:25:09 -0500, Jerry Haltom <jh...@fe...> wrote: > Yes, you heard it. I'm giving it a shot. I don't think it should be too > hard, all of Gtk at least is available. The build system does suck. I > have a few ideas for that now after having looked at it. > > Has anybody given this a shot yet? It doesn't seem that hard to me. The > JNI files will be compiled against the GTK distribution that Gimp gives > out, should work fine. Obvious pieces like Gconf aren't going to work. > > I'm looking for advice. :0 > > > |
59 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
