From: Steve H. <S.W...@ec...> - 2004-05-27 00:10:50
|
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 07:02:28 -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote: > > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 02:07:20 -0500, Jack O'Quin wrote: > > > It is not immediately obvious whether liblo handles relative URI's. > > > Would it accept "/jamin/scene" and route to the same port? > > Steve Harris <S.W...@ec...> writes: > > I dont think relative URIs have any real meaning in OSC, and I can't > > remenber what liblo does, probably a parse error - its URI handling is > > very crude. > > Wouldn't defaulting the "osc.udp://localhost:4444" part make sense? > It would use the default port and protocol on the local host. That > leaves "/jamin/scene" for message routing. Within JAMin, we could > even abbreviate to "scene", I suppose. This is somewhat analogous to > a relative URL reference within a web site. You can create an address "object" by giving the top level URI, then address individual pakets to a top level path relative to the server part (and the reverse for creating servers). You cant use real relative URLs though. - Steve |