From: Jack O'Q. <jo...@io...> - 2004-03-19 16:03:51
|
Steve Harris <S.W...@ec...> writes: > Yes. Paul is not keen on the c) idea, he would rather I pulled all the > dithering code thats kicking about the place and made a simple libdither, > with the same code/API as as in the alsa_pcm driver. I think he's right. Libdither sounds like an excellent idea, regardless. How does that conflict with c)? > > To change any parameters it would probably need to unload and > > reload the client (unless we invented a new scheme for passing > > parameter values to internal clients -- perhaps worth > > considering). > > Its called OSC :) Probably a good solution. Haven't studied the details yet. Would this use a new port type for passing the control messages? With OSC, I suppose a stand-alone UI could set dithering options anywhere in the network. JAMin could use the same control messages if we wanted a built-in UI specific to it. -- joq |