From: Jack O'Q. <jac...@gm...> - 2008-11-21 22:56:15
|
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:18 PM, John Rigg <ja...@so...> wrote: > I'm afraid I have to agree with Ron here. `Dumbing down' the default > interface might attract users who are not audio engineers, but it > is certainly not going to increase the number of professional > recording and mastering facilities using it. I know from talking > to colleagues in the business that the reason this software hasn't > been adopted more widely is that it runs on Linux. People aren't > familiar enough with it yet to risk using it to run their businesses. > That'll take time. Making the default settings useless for anything > but home demos isn't going to help. > > Paul Davis has addressed the problem of usability by making the SAE > version of Ardour, simplified for student use, available alongside the > "full power" standard version. That seems to be a more sensible approach > than turning what is supposed to be a professional mastering tool into > what looks at first glance to be a toy. We could do that. There could be two commands, both using the same internal real-time audio components. The stripped-down one would provide a simpler GUI. I'd suggest building them both in the same source tree. If done right, they could even share a single JACK graph (though that hardly seems useful). -- joq |