Re: [Iverilog-devel] Syntax question, is !&x valid?

[Niels M. <ni...@ly...>]

Martin Whitaker <ic...@ma...> writes:

> IEEE 1364-2005 appendix A says
>
> expression ::=
>     primary
>   | unary_operator { attribute_instance } primary
>   | expression binary_operator { attribute_instance } expression
>   | conditional_expression
>
> primary ::= 
  [...]

Thanks for explaining. I would have expected the grammar to include a
production like

 | unary_operator expression

but I guess there's some reason (historical or technical) why that's not
in the specified grammar.

Regards,
/Niels

-- 
Niels Möller. PGP key CB4962D070D77D7FCB8BA36271D8F1FF368C6677.
Internet email is subject to wholesale government surveillance.