From: Stephen W. <st...@ic...> - 2019-10-22 02:27:55
|
Because the .sft has some specificity that the .vpi does not have? Also, to read the .vpi file, you need to dynamically link it in so that you can read the tables. The ivl program currently does not need to load .vpi files, it can use the .sft files instead. That may be obsolete thinking, though... On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 12:19 PM Martin Whitaker <ic...@ma...> wrote: > > It is easy enough to extract the information from the .vpi file. I've > written a small standalone utility that does just that and writes out a > .sft file. But why not get the compiler to do it on the fly, rather than go > though an intermediate step? > > > _______________________________________________ > Iverilog-devel mailing list > Ive...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iverilog-devel -- Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. st...@ic... But I have promises to keep, http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep, http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep." |