|
From: Stephen W. <st...@ic...> - 2016-03-07 17:20:32
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This pull seems to have created a few new regressoins in VHDL code. These fail now. Are there ivtest changes that you need to push? steve@icarus:~/icarus/eda/ivtest> diff regression_report-devel.txt regression_report.txt 2089c2089 < vhdl_string_lim: Passed. - --- > vhdl_string_lim: ==> Failed - running iverilog. 2100c2100 < vhdl_textio_read: Passed. - --- > vhdl_textio_read: ==> Failed - running iverilog. 2115c2115 < vhdl_while: Passed. - --- > vhdl_while: ==> Failed - running iverilog. 2192c2192 < Total=2187, Passed=2181, Failed=6, Not Implemented=0, Expected Fail=0 - --- > Total=2187, Passed=2178, Failed=9, Not Implemented=0, Expected > Fail=0 On 03/07/2016 08:39 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > Hi, > > There is a new branch [1] that contains a few fixes for vhdlpp and > one for ivl. There are also tests to support the introduced changes > [2]. > > Again, it would be great if you could have a look at the ivl > related commit [3]. When I executed a certain test [4], it seemed > to me that slices were not correctly computed in a few cases. It > should be fixed now. > > The new pull request includes the previous one, so I have canceled > the old request. > > Regards, Orson > > 1. https://github.com/steveicarus/iverilog/pull/92 2. > https://github.com/orsonmmz/ivtest/tree/vhdlpp_fixes_test 3. > https://github.com/orsonmmz/iverilog/commit/de775975e8d846c2a591a7889dd26c96b76acbc3 > > 4. > https://github.com/orsonmmz/ivtest/blob/b926f97f9b1ece5d8a09a9be6fd4b33407c67d59/ivltests/array_packed_2d.v > > - -- Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep, http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep, http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlbduFcACgkQrPt1Sc2b3ilrAQCgupDe1BoNH8kZz6giaSphmBHO 6HcAoLkQuSgEglqtpeHG1TtEarkR+gUt =igHT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |