|
From: Stephen W. <st...@ic...> - 2016-02-24 16:14:47
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thanks, I'll take a look and merge it as soon as I can. (Busy day today.) On 02/24/2016 07:46 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > On 02/20/2016 03:00 AM, Stephen Williams wrote: >> On 02/15/2016 08:29 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: >>> It would be great if the ivl & vvp changes were reviewed more >>> carefully. recv_vec4_pv() seemed suspiciously simple, and I am >>> afraid I might have missed something important there. >> >> You did! What you missed is that those methods should be >> implemented in the derived classes, and not the vvp_net_fun_t >> class itself. The vvp_net_fun_t is used kinda like an abstract >> base class. > > Thank you for the notice. I have already fixed it and rebased the > branch. > > I am still not sure about the semantics though. It works for me, > and there is a test [1] that demonstrates what I was trying to > achieve, but I do not know if it covers all possible cases. > > Regards, Orson > > 1. > https://github.com/orsonmmz/ivtest/commit/bf46c7d1eaddeec88a0c21a6208a2cd3a51b85d1 > > - -- Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep, http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep, http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlbN1u4ACgkQrPt1Sc2b3ik8GACgk5CHibXMWIFvY4vZPmcftj84 dkgAniRtGIel5YIsYf8Zg9g/D0oX4NEJ =Ir0E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |