|
From: Stephen W. <st...@ic...> - 2016-02-20 02:00:56
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 02/15/2016 08:29 AM, Maciej Sumiński wrote: > It would be great if the ivl & vvp changes were reviewed more > carefully. recv_vec4_pv() seemed suspiciously simple, and I am > afraid I might have missed something important there. You did! What you missed is that those methods should be implemented in the derived classes, and not the vvp_net_fun_t class itself. The vvp_net_fun_t is used kinda like an abstract base class. - -- Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep, http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep, http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlbHyM8ACgkQrPt1Sc2b3iliTQCfSqPTjRd1QRojbb2YlkJewdaI LqgAn18h5rDtUy2gjgm5glUIAVfdhkC/ =evNv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |