Re: [Iverilog-devel] vhdlpp update

[Martin W. <mai...@ma...>]

Maciej Sumiński wrote:
> I enclose one more patch that needs a review. I am wondering if it is
> required for both arguments in NetEBDiv to have the same width? There is
> a testcase attached which causes an assertion failure, but in fact it
> works fine. It also does not break any other tests, but I might have
> missed something important there.
>
The first argument to $ivlh_to_unsigned should be treated as a self-determined 
expression. The compiler was not doing this; instead it was elaborating the 
argument using the cast width. I've pushed a fix for this to the master 
branch. I'll update the test suite later.

Martin