From: Cary R. <cy...@ya...> - 2008-03-05 17:52:13
|
--- Stephen Williams <st...@ic...> wrote: > I think this is a lot of hoopla for the testing of such a tiny feature. > I would rather not pollute the main test suite script for such rare > cases. Like I said in an earlier post, my preference is for you to have a local test for this that you run along with the normal test suite. I have a bunch of circuits I run locally to check for problem. It is these local tests that found pr1903343. As long as someone in the development process is testing this I think we can omit it from the test suite. Cary ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ |