From: Steven W. <st...@in...> - 2008-02-19 16:01:14
|
I'm not a contributor to Steve's C++ code base but I do have to deal with LOTS of Verilog code from different sources since I'm a consulting engineer. I make my living working on other people's code. I'm also a VI user (old habits are hard to break.) That being said - I've seen more unreadable code due to tabs than I can tell you. I've literally had to reformat code by hand to make it readable/understandable before I could deal with it. Looking at Steve's style statement AND Larry's point that it's Steve's codebase - I think you have your decision right there. Keep up the good work guys! Steve Wilson Stephen Williams wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Larry Doolittle wrote: > >> Guys - >> >> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 12:19:12PM -0800, Cary R. wrote: >> >>> --- Michael Witten <mfw...@MI...> wrote: >>> >>>> However, that was an uncharacteristic outburst of enthusiasm >>>> for tabs, which I've tried to use of recent. >>>> >>> Tabs save space and depending on your setup key strokes as well, but in >>> todays world I'm not so certain that the space savings is an issue and >>> many editors can be configured to automatically convert tabs and spaces >>> depending on preference. >>> >> I'm almost embarrassed to have brought up the subject in the first >> place. If the choice is between reliable, inconsistently spaced code, >> and buggy beautiful code, I'll take the former every time. >> > > stuff deleted for brevities sake. |