From: Cary R. <cy...@ya...> - 2008-01-28 21:31:24
|
--- Larry Doolittle <ldo...@re...> wrote: > Hey, competition is good! ;-) Yes it is, What you did is almost exactly the same as what I came up with. Though I would remove the disabled "if" since it serves no purpose other than to confuse someone later. I would also change the comment to be "If the entire value is shifted away connect the output to a constant V0 or for arithmetic right shift ">>>" connect all bits to the MSB." > > It may be time to consider formalizing a method for claiming bug > > reports and feature requests, as progress on these bugs and features > > is really heating up. It seems to me that the "Assigned To:" > > field in the trackers is perfect for this. > > It is, but that shouldn't keep others from jumping in if they have > something helpful to add. I agree "Assign To:" is what we should be using and is what I used in this case. > In this case, the construct that Uwe found is very close to what > I use routinely, so I really really wanted this bug fixed before > it decided to bite me, too. What is interesting is that if the conditional was correct >= vs > we would have known exactly where the bug or in this case missing functionality was and no incorrect code would have been generated. Cary ____________________________________________________________________________________ Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping |