From: Stephen W. <st...@ic...> - 2008-01-15 21:19:48
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Cary R. wrote: > --- Stephen Williams <st...@ic...> wrote: > >> My SystemVerilog draft is too old to show this, but I think the >> attribute assignment may include a type declaration along with the >> assignment. That would mean that in principle the existing attribute >> code can be extended in a SV-ish way to make the given code work. >> I think *this* is what we want to do. > > I agree we should code to a standard. If this is supported in SV we need > to know what the particulars are. Unfortunately it appears the two people > most likely to implement it do not have access to the SV standard > (1800-2005). > >>From memory I don't think the SV standard is too expensive, but it uses > the 1364-2005 standard as a base document. I only have a copy of > 1364-2001, so I'm probably not going to spend the money to get both > standards just to enhance iverilog. I have a copy of IEEE1364-1005 (printed) so I can make proper use of the SystemVerilog standard. These standards are somewhat painful to buy without funding, but I'll look into it. - -- Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep. steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep, http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep, http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep." -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHjSN2rPt1Sc2b3ikRAqIXAJ0Q0rSNXxNnfozNqFc2jPWoNDuPbwCfWfLO gTmbW7baMjvyrvzS0sI7D9U= =4vF3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |