-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Cary R. wrote:
> Hi Stevem
>
> It appears that the Cr rule, line 202, in vvp/lexor.lex is no longer
> needed since it cannot be matched. Or at least that is what my version of
> flex is saying.
It does seem redundant at this point. What I was thinking was that
it makes sense for the Cx<...> pseudo-symbols could stand for more
specific rules, but I can't really think of a rational argument for
why. Oh well. Somehow the redundancy should be killed.
- --
Steve Williams "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com But I have promises to keep,
http://www.icarus.com and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com And lines to code before I sleep."
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHlRllrPt1Sc2b3ikRAm1/AJ9i6js90P8tPy8HLY3JLhwVCkaE+wCg2gCf
DKb0v2A6PRdb44nQlKHrpsM=
=MOs5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
