#969 display.cc:85: bad assert

[dcb]

[display.cc:85]: (style) Same expression on both sides of '&&'.

Source code is

assert(isdigit(p) && isdigit((p+1)) && isdigit(*(p+1)));

I suspect

assert(isdigit(p) && isdigit((p+1)) && isdigit(*(p+2)));

would be better code.

[Cary R.]

It took me a bit to find this. It is actually in V0.9 not development. In development this code was moved to a different file and I verified that development is using *(p+2). I have updated V0.9 in git.