|
From: Oliver R. <oli...@gm...> - 2022-07-11 11:47:02
|
I also agree with the change. Oliver On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 12:46, Patrick Steinhardt <ps...@pk...> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:51:01AM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 02:07:01PM +0200, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > >to address this issue, i intend to generalize the GPL exception as per > > >the attached patch. > > > > > >>As a special exception, mbsync may be linked with libraries whose > > >>license contains advertising clauses. > > > > > come to think of it, this is ambiguous and may be used to completely > > subvert the gpl. let's try this instead: > > > > As a special exception, mbsync may be linked with libraries with a more > > restrictive license if the only incompatibility are advertising clauses. > > I agree with this change. > > Patrick > _______________________________________________ > isync-devel mailing list > isy...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/isync-devel |