Re: Nightmare with inbox case (Inbox / INBOX)

[Oswald B. <osw...@gm...>]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 07:04:31PM +0100, Florian Lombard wrote:
> Le 10/03/2017 à 18:53, Oswald Buddenhagen a écrit :
> > i guess pre-examining the messages and marking them as skipped is an
> > option (taking inspiration from the wip/placeholders branch would be
> > probably advisable).
>
> Actually, I've done that
> 
well, it's the wrong place. you need to do it in/around
copy_msg_convert(). after all, the point is filtering messages before
they are uploaded, irrespective of their source.

> Then I will make it configurable
> And hopefully I'll manage to cut too long lines with a regex like 
> s,(.{9900}),$1\r\n,g (configurable option, too) (this part is going to 
> be "funny" for me)
> 
that seems like major overkill to me.

> Or do you think it's a better approach to use a new tuid, like -3 ?
> 
no, leave that alone. the existing -2 for "failed" is just fine.

> As for digital signatures, as the messages are already not respecting 
> the RFC (1000 chars max per line) ... I guess it's not a big deal
> 
"be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you receive".

another option: mime-encapsulate the complete message. that will
preserve the original message.