Re: Nightmare with inbox case (Inbox / INBOX)

[Oswald B. <osw...@gm...>]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 06:41:11PM +0100, Florian Lombard wrote:
> I'm planning to do it the right way and contribute a patch, but I'm no
> C coder and the result may be ugly
> 
coding skills or not, i have no clue what the correct semantics would
be.
i guess pre-examining the messages and marking them as skipped is an
option (taking inspiration from the wip/placeholders branch would be
probably advisable).
alternatively, the messages could be re-coded to something valid, say
quoted-printable (which introduces line breaks as needed). that would
still invalidate digital signatures, but better than nothing.